Become a Bison rancher

Far more buffalo can be grazed per acre than cattle. It’s likely wild bison will return to the Great Plains in the future.   Already there are fewer people in areas where the Ogalla aquifer has been depleted than when Native Americans roamed the tall grass prairie.

Lott’s book “American Bison” is hardly a bison ranching manual — in fact the book might scare potential bison ranchers away.

Below are some of my favorite paragraphs from this book (which I found in its entirety online). If you’re intrigued, you can buy the book at amazon for only four dollars (on September 21, 2014).

Lott, Dale F. 2002. American Bison: A Natural History. University of California Press.

It’s hard to imagine-as you fly above mile after mile of corn, soybeans, and cattle feedlots or drive between them-but before East Africa became safari land, rich adventurers went on safari on the Great Plains. Buffalo Bill got his start in show business by laying on a safari for the Czarevitch of Russia-the Grand Duke Alexis. The Great Plains was a good choice. This vast, little-disturbed natural community covered a third of the United States-creating wonder, inviting adventure. Part of the appeal was the exotic indigenous people, but the main attraction was a sea of grass inhabited by an assemblage of animals mostly unknown elsewhere, and dominated by enormous herds of buffalo.


In late July and early August, plumes of dust, rising with earth-warmed air from the brown grass and rolling rangeland, ascend into that bowl. The dust makers, a herd of bison on the National Bison Range, are going about their business-breeding;


Most of the dust comes from wallows, shallow pits where the bison have torn away the sod with their horns and where the subsoil, dried by the sun and stirred by hooves and horns, turns to a flourlike dust. Some of the plumes start when threatening bulls paw and roll in these wallows; but most occur when fighting bulls plow the soil with their hooves, or when they slam their heads together and the shock explodes dust from their bodies. Now an old bull bellows. His back arches, his belly lifts, his neck extends, and a sound that seems equal parts lion’s roar and thunderclap booms across the grass. An eighteen-inch scar runs up his ribs. His horn tips, shattered in other battles, are blunted and worn. Fifty yards away his opponent, a six-year-old bull in his prime, bellows back, glances at the cow he is tending, then urinates into the dust of a wallow and rolls in it, slamming his 2,000 pounds sideways into the dust. It spurts from beneath him, filling the air around him like the burst of smoke a stage magician vanishes into. The prime bull emerges from this cloud, headed toward the old bull in a menacing walk. His forefeet stamp with each step, making the hair pantaloons on his legs dance and exploding little puffs of dust from his coat. As each front foot stamps, the bull snorts. His tail stands up like a living question mark. It’s an impressive display, and from where I sit, in an ancient jeep, an intimidating one. But the old bull is not intimidated. He too has wallowed and now advances, matching stamp with stamp, snort with snort. As they grow closer their bellows intensify; they seem to signify pure fury. Most such challenges seem to be elaborate tests of the opponent’s determination and end without a fight. Most fights involve a cautious locking of horns or hooking uppercuts or shoving head to head, ended when one animal signals submission and the winner lets him go. But this is not a test of determination and it’s a different kind of fight-one of those in which the bulls hurl themselves at each other, elongating their bulky bodies into animated battering rams as they launch themselves for the first blow. Their heads come together with a terrific shock. It ripples through their bodies in a visible wave. I once saw a bull somersaulted backward by such a charge: 2,000 pounds of bull flipped upside down like a lawn chair in a gust of wind. Both these bulls hold position after the first shock and dig in for a serious fight. They slam their heads together again. Clumps of hair the size of a fist are caught between their short, heavy, curved horns, then sheared off and tossed into the air. The animals circle, each trying to reach the other’s flank with a hooking horn. Both pivot around their forefeet with the speed of featherweight boxers, and each parries the other’s seeking horns with his own while their powerful necks absorb some of the force of the impact. Their hair absorbs some too. By the time a bull is six years old, a mat of hair several inches thick extends from the top of his head down across his forehead, thinning gradually until it stops just above his muzzle. His eyes peer from shallow wells, his ears flick out from deep recesses, and the space between his horns is completely filled with this luxuriant growth. Beneath this natural shock absorber, a thick layer of tough hide covers a rock-solid skull. Now the bulls lock horns and push hard, their hooves plowing soil as each tries to drive his opponent back. The old bull is pushed back and a little sideways, dust spurting from beneath his skidding feet. Suddenly a foot catches on a rock and he trips and falls onto his side. It is rare for a helpless bull to be attacked by the winner, but this time it happens. The younger bull strikes down and forward with his horns, slamming them into the old bull’s flank and hooking right and left. The curves of his horns make most of the contact and deliver bruising, possibly rib-breaking, but not fatal blows. Then the tip of one horn plunges through skin and muscles and into his opponent’s abdomen. Only one horn penetrates, and it penetrates only once, but the wound will be mortal.


While physical prowess is an essential tool in managing a relationship between two males, it can’t be the only tool, and in fact it’s one of the least-often used. Much more frequently they use communication


A territorial animal can predict attack pretty successfully by knowing territorial boundaries. The territory owner usually challenges all competitors within a given space and keeps up the pressure with threats and attacks until they leave. But bull bison aren’t territorial. They are roamers, drifting singly or in small, temporary groups. Because they cannot use their location in space to predict whether or not another animal will attack them, they read the animals around them, detecting and responding to behavior that consistently precedes an attack.


A bull doesn’t just walk toward his opponent: he stamps with each step, setting his foreleg pantaloons dancing, and grunting with each stamp. If forewarned is forearmed, why not attack first and give indication later? The reason, of course, is that it may not be necessary to attack at all.


Fighting is an occasionally necessary grand spectacle, but the real biological drama lies in the complex, drawn-out, and frequently subtle ways in which most conflicts are settled by communication. Bulls do most of their communicating during the breeding season-the only time during the year that mature bulls and cows are together for any length of time. The bulls have been alone or in small, temporary groups. Now they join the cows, which have been living in larger groups with the calves and young bulls. The bulls seek out cows about to breed and stay with them (they “tend” them), keeping other bulls away by threatening and fighting. But threatening and fighting are also common between bulls that are not defending cows. Since receptive cows are the only scarce resource in the bull’s economy, this seems surprising at first: one wonders what the nontending bulls are fighting about. But a rival dominated now will probably give way later without a contest, saving a tending bull time and energy when he has none to spare. Not that the bull works it all out in this fashion. He simply has a powerful urge to dominate other bulls, and following this impulse works to his advantage. The drive to dominate is so powerful that it occasionally interferes with his real business and its ultimate function-bulls will sometimes leave a receptive cow to threaten a distant bull.


On a still day a bull’s bellow carries for miles. It’s a sort of roaring rumble, and if you can’t see the bull or don’t recognize the sound you may guess it’s a thunderstorm. If the competition presses, the bellowing becomes louder, and a quality that is hard to define but somehow easy to recognize-a quality of fury-begins to grow in it. Often one or both bulls will interrupt their bellowing to paw the ground or wallow.


If the challenge does not end at the wallowing or bellowing stage, the bulls draw closer to each other and begin to posture. There seem to be two distinct postures. In the “head-on threat,” which is simply the posture and movement that precedes a charge, the bull moves toward his opponent with his head held slightly to one side. The more slowly the challengers are moving, the farther to the side their heads are held. When they approach nearly straight on, either one bull submits by turning away or they bang heads. But when they approach slowly with their heads well to one side, they often stop close to, but not quite touching, each other and “nod-threat.” Nod-threatening bulls stand close enough to reach one another; their bodies may form a single straight line or an angle of up to ninety degrees, but in either case they turn their heads aside. From this position they can attack suddenly by hooking a horn into the opponent’s head. The hook always starts when the head is close to the ground, the muzzle tucked back. But in the threat itself, the head-low, muzzle-back position is only a brief interruption of a head-high stance: the bulls’ heads drop in a matched movement, then swing back up again, still to one side. A hooking attack may start at the bottom of any one of the down swings, but the opponent never seems to be caught off guard. After a series of such nods one animal may suddenly submit, ending the clash. Nod-threatening takes place most often between bulls that are not tending cows, as does the “broadside threat.” A bull in this posture keeps himself broadside to his opponent with his head held a little higher than normal. Usually his back is arched and he is bellowing. If he moves, he does so slowly, in short, stiff steps that keep him broadside to his opponent. Often two bulls will threaten by standing parallel to each other just a few feet apart. Only rarely does this threat lead to a fight. The encounter may be long as threats go, lasting up to a minute or more, but one of the animals almost always submits. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison All bison submission signals are variations on a theme: the submitting bull turns away. Sometimes it’s a 180-degree turn followed by a galloping retreat. At other times it’s an abbreviated swing of the head and neck to one side. When it involves a go-degree turn, the submitting animal ends up in the same general position as one who is threatening broadside. But it’s easy to tell the difference. In submission the bull’s head is usually low, muzzle extended as if to graze-and sometimes he does graze-and the bull is silent. Whatever form the submission signal takes, it almost always stops the threats or attack immediately.


How would a winning bull penalize himself by polishing off a loser? In fact, he would be deprived of two precious commodities: time and energy. The breeding season, when most conflicts take place, is limited, and time spent fighting, even a mop-up operation, is time lost from breeding. Fights to the finish would take even more energy, and that’s in shorter supply than you might imagine. When you see bulls in the middle of summer, in the midst of tall grass and warm sunshine, their good health and nutrition seem assured. But bison are northern animals, one of the most northern of the cattle family. They have adapted to a climate where food is scarce through long winter months. Bulls die during the winter if fall catches them without enough energy stored as body fat. As it is, the breeding season takes a lot of energy. Mature males lose an average of 200 pounds between June and October. If every fight were long and rough and ended in a cross-country chase, bison bulls, winners and losers alike, might well die before spring renewed the plains.


The prolonged forewarnings, the reluctance to fight, and the generosity to losers are neither the last noble vestiges of chivalry in our time nor nature’s way of exhorting humans to live on a higher ethical plane. Rather, they are carefully balanced behavioral adjustments to the social and ecological circumstances in which the competition between bulls evolved.


The older they get, the more likely they are to take the risks of combat in order to tend a breedable cow-not because older mature bulls are more likely to win than younger mature bulls, but because they have less to lose. Thereby hangs an intriguing budgeting issue, which might be titled “How to spend your life the way that buys the most descendants.” It’s an investment program in which your life is your capital and the return is your offspring’s offspring. For male bison, producing offspring usually involves conflict. Each such conflict puts their lives at risk. A bull bison’s optimal investment strategy weighs possible losses against possible gains and decides how much risk is prudent. He’s balancing making a killing against getting killed. Now, a male is not going to live forever, so an optimal strategy must be age sensitive. The younger he is, the more time and future opportunities he stands to lose if he dies. So he should invest cautiously when he’s young and has more to lose, but more and more boldly as he gets older and has less to lose. Bison behavior tracks this straightforward logic-the old bulls are the bold bulls. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison The way to a bull’s enthusiastic attendance is through his vomernasal organ, a sensory organ found in many mammals; it has an opening in the roof of the mouth. Cows’ urine is full of facts about how near ovulation is. The bull’s vomernasal organ seems specialized for an analysis of female urine chemistry that provides information on when a female will be ready to breed. But while bulls will joust seriously to get some female urine on their vomernasal organ, I’ve never noticed that females go out of their way to present it. However, I have many times seen bulls during the rut bring a resting cow to her feet by prodding her belly gently but firmly with a horn. The cows arise, with what I take to be resignation, and often urinate in a minute or two. The bull thrusts his muzzle into the stream of urine, then elevates his head, upper lip curled, tongue fluttering inside his mouth, his whole demeanor suggesting a gourmet’s appreciation of a fine wine. If he goes from lip-curling to tending, the chances are good that the cow will breed sometime that day.


We call the several hours before the cow breeds pre-estrus, and bulls that test the urine of pre-estrous cows are likely to try to spend the next few hours with her. That’s not easy to do. Pre-estrous cows become restless-breaking away from a tending bull and running through the herd. A running cow attracts bulls, and a string of them are soon following her just as a tail follows its comet. When she stops they gather and quickly sort out who among the present company gets to stand by his cow. The cow’s best shot at having many grandchildren is to have sons that can claim a cow just as this bull claimed her. If we assume “like father, like son,” he is the best candidate in the immediate circle-but the cow may well make him prove it again with another run through the herd. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

the lower the tending bull’s rank, the more likely it was that the tended cow would run. In addition, cows that ran usually ended up with a bull that ranked higher than the one they ran from.


Tending pairs are unveiled as the movement of a grazing herd leaves them behind. Study a pair and you will see the cow grazing a bit, looking fretfully toward the increasingly distant herd. A big bull stands beside her, moving to block her when she sets off after the departing herd. He moves like a basketball player staying between a dribbling point guard and the goal. Sometimes she allows him to hold her in place, but “allows” is the operative word. His moves to block her are quick and graceful, but she is still quicker and more graceful. If she stays it’s because she has chosen-or at least settled for-him, not because he has chosen her. She may head straight for another tending bull. When Jerry Wolff compared the ranks of the bulls left to those approached, he found the cows were usually approaching a higher ranking bull. That’s one of the forms of choice a cow has, and it makes sense for her to be as choosy as she can manage to be. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison We don’t yet know what cues besides age the cow may use in making her choice. Could all that bellowing make a difference as to which bull is standing beside her when she stops running? Could it work like some birdsongs or frog croaks-a clue to the female about who might be a better mate? The bulls don’t seem to be sending a signal-they appear only to bellow to other bulls. They seldom bellow unless they already have a cow, are trying to displace a bull that has one, or are in the midst of a dominance contest. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison However important bellows may be to a resistant cow, her priorities and behavior change as ovulation approaches. The time of choosing is a period of conflict between the cow and the many courting bulls. The more competitors, the better for her but the worse for him. His earlier behavior minimized the number, hers maximized it. But now their interests coincide, and they must cooperate and collaborate. Often the cow redirects the relationship. Her physiology is changing fast, altering her behavior along with it. Now, instead of breaking into a gallop every time the bull is distracted by a challenger, she follows him, and when he has disposed of the distraction she stands close, perhaps even positions herself in front of him. If he continues to glower round at the competition instead of mounting her, she may announce her readiness to breed by licking him or by sticking a horn in his ribs and prying upward-extracting from the bull a grunt, a tuft of hair, and more attention. She may even mount him, and when he begins to mount her she squirts forward like a stepped-on bar of wet soap, but plants her feet and moves her tail to one side. Even so he may half mount, then drop off several times before he catches on and copulates. Bison sex does not involve a lingering mingling of mucous membranes. He clamps his forelegs around her ribs and penetrates with a lunge. The bull almost always ejaculates within five seconds of intromission (I timed it from movies of the event). His last pelvic thrust is driven home by a contraction of his abdominal muscles so strong that it jerks his hind feet forward and completely clear of the ground, making the 1,100-pound cow’s hindquarters suddenly support an extra ton of buffalo. Brief though the encounter is, it’s usually enough for the cow. She staggers under his weight, not infrequently limps for a while afterward, and four times out of five rejects further attempts by this or any other bull to mount her again for the coming twelve months.


In a well-nourished herd, 85 to 90% of the mature cows will bear a calf in the spring. Breeding season moves at a spanking pace. I’ve seen half the cows breed in the peak four days.


While breeding, bulls lose 10 to 15 percent of their body weight-mostly fat they will dearly miss in the coming winter. But the potential rewards are also enormous. The winning bulls win big. One year I saw one bull breed five cows while others bred none-one-third of the bulls sired two-thirds of the coming spring’s calves. Over three years Jerry Wolff saw one bull breed sixteen cows, while another never bred. The biologists Joel Berger and Carol Cunningham followed a herd for four years and saw one bull breed twenty-eight times while others never bred.


more and more of the bulls drift away to concentrate on providing their complicated digestive system with the fodder it will convert to fat to carry them through the winter. Their interactions change from constant confrontation to nearly invariable tolerance or passive avoidance. They’re not looking for any trouble, and, in the two months following the rut, they come to look a lot less like trouble. The magnificent, menacing mass of hair on their forehead and between their horns, the flowing beard, and the dancing pantaloons that gave advancing bulls such presence are gone. Much of the hair between their horns was barbered away-caught between rubbing horns and sheared off during fights. But the rest of that hair, the beard and the pantaloons, simply falls out after the rut ends and before winter starts. Only mature bulls molt this way, not cows and not even young bulls. Perhaps the hair loss is triggered by the stress of the rut-and perhaps instead, or in addition, it de-escalates the tension between the bulls: each benefits by looking less big-male threatening


Storing and using fat is somewhat inefficient. Converting digested food to fat uses some of the food’s energy, and converting it back to usable energy requires still more. But what the process lacks in efficiency it makes up in reliability. It makes it possible to survive lean times like the hard winters that always lie ahead


dominance relationships between the cows are no laughing matter. While there’s very little violence, there’s lots more subtle action. Alan counted aggressive interactions and saw two per cow-hour, ranging from a subordinate withdrawing to a dominant swinging her horns or lunging. The cows are under social pressure, expressed in the physical and social distance between neighbors. As is so often true of participants in relationships, they want to be close, but not too close. The closer a cow’s neighbors, the less the danger from wolves but the more the competition-for food, wallows, and water. Being close takes a lot of fine-tuning. Every step brings you closer or takes you farther away from several others, all of whom are also fine-tuning the distance they are from you. Physically, a buffalo cow just plods across ground and through air. But socially, it’s as though the air between each two cows were contained in transparent bags that compress and expand as each animal moves closer to or farther from a neighbor. The pressure inside the bags depends on the relationship between a cow and each of her neighbors; and since the relationship is not symmetrical, the pressure of the “same” bag is different for each of the cows. The dominant member of a pair may feel a little pressure when stepping toward her neighbor, while the subordinate may feel intense pressure when stepping toward the dominant, and not move as far. In addition, the cows can vary that stable, baseline pressure. A deferential head duck by the subordinate decreases the pressure for both; a threatening head swing by the dominant raises the pressure for the subordinate. The cows aren’t seeking an absence of pressure. If they can’t feel any there they find somebody. And up to an optimal point, the more pressures they can feel the better. Being a dominant member of a group has high potential payoff.


In Yellowstone Park, subordinates searched more and harvested less than dominants. Feast and famine were regular visitors to the Great Plains, with wet weather in some years and drought in others. In drought years every mouthful became precious to a cow eating to store enough fat to trigger ovulation and to carry a growing fetus through a hard winter. Dominance would have a big payoff in those years. And dominance would pay off any time that the snow was deep. Foraging bison sweep the snow from the grass by swinging their heads from side to side and using their muzzles as plows. They clear little craters in the snow and eat the grass at the bottom. At least, they eat that grass unless and until a dominant makes them move on and takes over that patch. A dominant will eat everything it clears and some that it doesn’t clear. A subordinate will eat only part of what it clears. That difference can be really big at crucial times. All other things being equal, the dominants will get fatter and the subordinates will get leaner. So the cows are interacting constantly, dominants and subordinates in a careful dance of distance; and being the dominant is worthwhile.


2-year-olds dominated 1-year-olds, and 3-year-olds dominated 2-year-olds; through age eight, all older cows dominated all younger ones. When they were young, of course, the older cows were also bigger than the younger cows. But by the time they were 3 years old that was no longer so, for they’d reached their full size. Yet 3-year-olds, even when bigger, didn’t dominate 6-year-olds.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison it’s typical of a dominance system that the dominant individuals launch a steady stream of preemptive bullyings-sort of like those “Don’t even think about it” admonitions.


on Catalina only about 30% annually were giving birth. We captured 7 cows in a corral, determined their weight and age, and then hung radio transmitters around their necks and watched them. In a corral the cows had a strict dominance hierarchy. That hierarchy correlated perfectly with body weight: every cow dominated every lighter cow and was subordinate to every heavier one. Weight was all that mattered-age was irrelevant. Dominant cows ate better than subordinate, going through the oat hay in the feed troughs to get the grain that fell from the shattered heads and leaving the straw for the less dominant who were waiting their turn. After a few days of watching, we turned the cows back to the Range and followed them for four years. They went their separate ways, and we only rarely saw them together again. The more dominant they were in that corral for those few days, the more calves they had. The heaviest, most dominant cows calved every year; the lightest, most subordinate not at all. That is a huge difference. Natural selection is nothing more than some individuals rearing more offspring than others.


On the National Bison Range calves are born in April and May-spring /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison Within a minute or two, as soon as his mother has freed him from the membrane that surrounded him in the womb, he begins a frantic-seeming struggle to get to his feet. He gets halfway up several times, and falls forward, backward, and sideways. I think, “Take it easy, little one, rest a minute. There’s no rush!” But the brain that has guided calves to adulthood for thousands of generations knows better. The calf hasn’t got a minute to spare. Wolves may arrive any moment. A late winter storm could drop six inches of snow tonight, and winter is certain to return in a few months. Winter and wolves. These ancient forces selected which among calves past would bear or sire another generation. And so they have shaped this calf-bones, brains, and behavior. To survive them the calf must grow: bigger, faster, fatter. So much growing to do, in so little time.


Adult bison spend a good part of their day ruminating; it’s an essential part of their digestion. But bison calves don’t ruminate for the first three months.


The calf needs to stay close to its mother, and to nurse. Evolution not only made nursing a necessity but set up a positive feedback loop. Nursing releases oxytocin, so the more the calf nurses the more mother loves it; and the more she loves it the more she allows it to nurse. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

A bison calf’s first priority is to get to its feet and walk. By the stopwatch I kept time with as I watched a dozen births, that takes all of seven or eight minutes. An hour-old calf can scamper pretty well.


The bouncing baby bison doesn’t bounce aimlessly. It bounces toward something big and close. Mom is big and close and the ball usually bounces her way. But sometimes it fixes its eye on some other bison that passes by and rushes after it. Then mother chases both down and retrieves her young. A calf a few months old that loses its mother will attach itself to anything large and moving. An orphan calf followed Captain Meriwether Lewis all one afternoon as he walked west beside the Missouri River.


Many animals that move in herds or flocks have a call that signals with much the same effect of a human crying out, “I’m here; where are you?”


You hear their call occasionally while the animals are grazing, more frequently as a group of cows and calves walk along as they’re going somewhere-say to water. You hear a lot of grunting when a herd has just stampeded, separating cows and calves. Mothers and calves grunt to each other across a post stampede herd and track the right-sounding voice they hear to a reunion. The grunts that are so alike to our ears are different enough to theirs to convey identity-like a familiar voice saying hello when answering your phone call. But like someone responding to an on-the-phone hello, the hearer sometimes gets it wrong. I’ve several times seen a cow and a calf exchange grunts across a herd, make their way through it and come together, noses extended, only to fail the gold standard-the sniff test.


To measure the life span of a relationship, you must record first its birth, then its death. It’s easy to say when a cow-calf relationship begins, but harder to say when it is over. So we rely on proximity-inferring that the closer the bodies, the closer the relationship.


mothers must choose where to give birth. She and the calf need some way to ensure that each develops a relationship with the right other individual-smells the right smell, hears the right voice. For though they have been intensely connected physiologically-sharing one body and one blood supply-socially they are complete strangers. They must create the relationship quickly and surely, before the precocious calf becomes so mobile that it mingles with others that look and sound very like it. Cows can make sure of that privacy by being alone when they give birth. On Catalina Island most cows gave birth in solitude, usually among bushes, scrub oak, ceanothus, or coast live oak trees. There they were hard to see. They had both privacy and shelter from prying eyes-they had cover. But on the National Bison Range most cows stayed in their herd to give birth. There were exceptions to both rules, but the general patterns showed a striking distinction between the two places. This difference must have a cause, and my reasoning centers around the trade-offs between privacy and predation. Wolves hunt mostly by sight. If wolves are your worry, then being out of their sight is best. If there are bushes or trees you can hide among them. But if the tallest plants are ankle-high grasses, the only thing big enough to hide behind is another bison-or better still, a bunch of bison. On the National Bison Range I was watching cows give birth on a grassland; on Catalina Island they were giving birth in a coastal scrub community.


Selection has prepared a pregnant mother to prepare for another calf. Part of that preparation takes the form of ceasing to invest in her current calf so she can rebuild herself to deliver a healthy calf in just nine months. Thus the best deal for the cow is to invest less in this calf so she can invest more in the calf to come. She’s equally related to both, and to her calves that may come even further in the future. That’s not the best deal for the current calf. Mother’s new calf is unlikely to be closer than a half sibling-sharing one-fourth of its genes. All things considered, its best deal is for mother to continue to invest in it no matter the cost to its future half siblings. The result is a classic conflict of genetic interest. Pregnancy is crunch time. Now the cow has one calf at her udder and one in her womb. Her resources-her energy and her body’s tissues-are finite, and she must divide them between her two calves. Wendy’s pregnant cows’ behavior toward the one at their udder changed sharply, unlike the behavior of the mothers that didn’t get pregnant. Through the next three months (until the calf was six months old), pregnant mothers were more than twice as aggressive toward their calves when they nursed and attempted to nurse. From six months on, the differences were even more dramatic. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison the calf isn’t just pushed away, it also walks away-choosing to spend more and more time with age-mates and getting more and more of its nutrition from the grasses it grazes. Sons become mere acquaintances first, but daughters eventually do too, when they have their first calf, if not before. Each is pursuing the path that will maximize the number of its genes in the next generation. They have moved on.


Harvey Wallbanger, a flesh-and-blood buffalo, regularly showed his heels to racehorses in the 440-yard dash. Harvey’s triumph would not have surprised the Sioux, Crow, Black-feet, Comanches, and Cheyennes who hunted buffalo from horseback for nearly two centuries. While most of their horses could overtake one buffalo, only a few could overtake several buffalo in one chase. A buffalo’s skinny rump and long front legs give it a long-enduring stride-a good match for a coursing predator like the wolf. It is an animal faster than, well, some speeding racehorses, and able to leap tall road cuts at a single bound.


Management installed some cattle guards on the National Bison range. They were working fine for buffalo cows and calves, but not very well for bulls. Bulls were getting past them somehow, and one day I saw how. A bull walked calmly up the road to a cattle guard, stood placidly on one side of it, then hopped-no other word would really describe it-across, landing on all four feet on the other side. This hop had to be long enough to deposit his hind feet on the far side of the cattle guard, so he cleared the width of the cattle guard plus the distance from his front feet to his rear feet, say another six feet, for a total of fourteen feet. A very impressive standing broad jump. Well, at least I was impressed. If the bull was impressed, it didn’t show. He stood where he had landed for a quiet moment, then, with an air of “been here, done this,” cropped a mouthful of grass from the side of the road and walked on-patiently and efficiently.


National Bison Range personnel countered the buffalo hop strategy by placing 2 cattle guards end to end. Now a bull would have to hop 16 plus 6 feet; and so far as I know, none ever did. But buffalo bulldom had not exhausted the arrows in its quiver. One day in breeding season I pulled my ancient Jeep to the side of the road, just after passing through one of these amplified cattle guards, and sat looking at the herd ahead of me. From behind came a distinct pinging, as though someone were tapping something metal with a piece of wood. A bull’s image filled most of my rearview mirror. He was in the middle of the cattle guard, placing his feet delicately, cautiously, one at a time but still confidently, so they were centered on the narrow bars of the cattle guard as he walked across with all the poise, and a good bit of the daring, of a man on a tightrope. I would not have been any more astonished if he had also been singing “Tiptoe through the Tulips” in a friendly falsetto. When he reached solid ground he walked past me and joined the herd, leaving me to ponder the demonstration of footwork finesse I had just witnessed and somehow make it fit with the demonstrations of brute power I had also seen. For while buffalo leaps and sprints are spectacular, walking is the athletic talent that brings the animals to food and water day after day. Bison are roamers. Even in the confined spaces where they live today, they will travel ten or twelve miles overnight. On the Great Plains they may have traveled hundreds of miles from season to season-perhaps searching for a better place to spend the winter, or for a location with fewer human beings. They surely gained something from each step of those journeys, but (and here is where a physical feat is required) to be profitable each had to gain them enough to offset its costs. And the cost is high; bulls weigh about a ton. When a vehicle that size is fueled with blades of grass, every blade has to count. So the athletic challenge becomes like one of those competitions to see how far a vehicle can travel on a gallon of gas. It’s all about efficiency-getting the most out of every drop of gas or blade of grass. Why is it that an animal that runs so fast walks so slow? It’s all about energy. Buffalo, and just about everything else that walks, set a pace that matches the natural period of the pendulum constituted by its leg. A buffalo’s leg, like yours and mine, swings forward and back as the animal walks, so it’s a pendulum.


At its natural period pace a buffalo, or any other 4-footed beast, can recover 35 to 50% of the energy put into each stride. But when it comes to walking, two legs are better. Bipedal striders (creatures like ostriches and us) recover more, maybe as much as 70% of each stride’s energy just by walking naturally.


Harvey Wallbanger didn’t walk away from those racehorses. Both parties were galloping flat out for a quarter of a mile, and both could gallop-a little more slowly, to be sure-for miles and miles, as most hoofed animals can. How do they get the energy? By conserving it. This illustrates not the pendulum effect, since the bison’s legs are moving much faster than their natural period, but more a pogo stick effect. As their feet land, they store the force of gravity in tendons and ligaments threaded the long way around the joints in their legs. When their legs flex with gravity, those ligaments and tendons stretch like the spring on a screen door, and that energy is recovered as the leg straightens for the next step.


Sheep can recover about 30% of their running energy this way, and camels may recover 50%. Buffalo fall somewhere in that range. We humans don’t have the feet for this feat. Bison are always on their toes: that joint about a third of the way up their leg isn’t a backward knee but the heel of their foot, and the tendon from their real knee to their toes is long and stretchy. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison A bull has to twist and turn-quickly enough to protect his own flanks, quickly enough to get a horn into his opponent’s flank. Selection is intense. Bulls are wounded every breeding season, and in most years 5 or 6 percent of the mature bulls in any population die of their wounds. So the bulls are built to be quick in battle. To protect their body with their head, they need to pivot around their front feet. They have a great form for that function: much of their weight is centered over their front legs-their diminutive rear end is balanced in part by their massive head and neck. And the weight of their head is partly suspended from a point above their shoulders.


There, rays of bone a foot long (called vertebral processes) project up from their vertebrae and anchor a tendon that attaches to the rear of the skull. This efficiently supports the transfer of their head’s weight to their front feet, on which they pirouette on the sod like a hockey player on ice.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison many plants produce tannin, which does nothing for the plant but makes it difficult for the animal that eats it to digest proteins. Many plant eaters, including humans, have evolved a countermeasure-our saliva contains a molecule that binds with tannin and neutralizes it. The astringent taste of the neutralized tannin gives a sip of red wine its special flavor.


Grass hasn’t evolved tannin, but it stores most of its carbohydrates as cellulose, and until the cellulose has been digested the carbohydrates are not available. In turn, most of the Great Plains’ big animals-bison, antelope, deer, and elk-counter cellulose with rumination, which turns grass into gas: figurative gas, as fuel to run their physical systems, and literal gas, as methane. Digesting anything is a strictly chemical matter of subjecting it to an enzyme that breaks certain molecular bonds, simple enough if you have the right enzyme. Put the food in your digestive tract, secrete the enzyme. Neither you nor I can secrete an enzyme that can digest cellulose. As a matter of fact, bison don’t secrete such an enzyme either, but they rely on a method as good and in some ways better: they enlist colonies of bacteria.


A third of mature bulls have at least one rib that has been broken and has healed.


WALLOWING. All bison wallow several times a day in summer, filling their hair with dust. The dust probably discourages insects and may reduce the bison’s body temperature.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison Bison cool their bodies by evaporating water from their lungs. On hot summer days they need a lot of water. On Catalina Island, cows go to water twice a day, drinking four to six gallons at a time. Bulls there drink once a day in the summer. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison WILD BULL RESISTING ROUNDUP The bull pictured is reacting to men trying to move him through a corral on the National Bison Range during the annual roundup. Handling wild bison is difficult, dangerous, and expensive. Domestication will select for more tractable-hence less wild-animals. This bull’s behavior will be tolerated in this publicly owned herd, but a rancher would be compelled to shoot him. Some buffalo, usually castrated males, have been trained to carry a rider or pull a cart. They remain dangerous.


Bison are better suited to western grasslands than are cattle, requiring less care and doing less damage. More than 95 percent of bison in North America are privately owned and live on ranches. There selective breeding will produce a domesticated form of bison with little wildness left.


fermentation bacteria have waste products, which include alcohol. It’s a sobering fact that 12 or 13 percent of a bottle of Dom Perignon Champagne is bacteria pee.


For the bison a percentage of bacteria waste products that high would be a calamity, because it would mean that the bacteria were themselves using the energy their enzymes were releasing. Here we come to one of those built-in conflicts of interest that are part of nearly all relationships. Up to the point of converting cellulose to usable carbos and fatty acids, bison and bacteria have the same goals and collaborate. But now each has its own uses for the energy the enzymes have released-now they compete. It has to be a restrained competition, because both would starve if either were to get all the energy. Yet within the rumen, subtly different lines of bacteria must be striving to win a bigger share of the goodies. The bacteria-on-bacteria competition takes place in a friendly environment-the bison’s rumen-so the bison, being the environment as well as collaborator and competitor, has leverage that makes up for its slower evolutionary rate.


Bison don’t limit their bacteria’s food, but they severely limit their oxygen and their time. Some bacteria-anaerobic bacteria-can function without oxygen, but they function slowly. In time they would use up the energy they have released from the grass, so bison don’t give them time. They move the grass on out of the rumen after two or three days, pushing the partially digested food, and some of the bacteria that digested it to that point, further on. In the stomach, their own enzymes finish the job on the plants and digest some of the helpful bacteria as well. Timing is everything in this matter, and the ruminants have the timing down so well that they get about 90% of the energy for themselves. The mechanics of rumination are a bit inelegant. The ruminant assists the process by chewing its food after swallowing it-the bison brings up fist-sized wads of partially digested grass (cuds) from its rumen and chews them while lying at rest. If Buffalo Bill and the Czarevitch had sat in their saddles and contemplated a resting bison they’d have seen this; bison spend hours every day doing it. Although cud chewing-ruminating-gives them a faraway-focused, meditative, serene sort of look, it isn’t an elegant activity. But as an adaptation, rumination is elegance itself.


The immediate products of bison digestion are heat, energy, and tissue maintenance for the digesters’ bodies. The final end products of bison digestion are buffalo calves and buffalo chips.


Analyzing parasites is the most straightforward part of this study-just look and count. Figuring out what bison are eating is also straightforward, though rather more time-consuming. The cell walls of plants are pretty distinctive and pretty tough. You pick through the chips and locate cell walls. You compare the cell walls to the cell walls of plants from your reference collection-representatives of each plant that grows where the bison are feeding. The reference collection is needed to set some boundaries on your search for matches. And that’s it. You can find out how many of the plants in its habitat a bison feeds on and, by comparing the percentage appearing in the chips with the percentage in the field, estimate which plants the bison favors.


Why aren’t all buffalo white? White is a good summer color. It reflects the sun’s heat, and that heat is a fact of life for bison. They evolved in the grasslands, where summer sunshine is plentiful and shade is nonexistent; bison spend most of the long summer days absorbing the sun’s heat into their dark coats. White is also a good winter color. Some rabbits turn white in the winter to blend with the snow, and so do some of the weasels that stalk them. Wolves hunt bison all winter long. Wouldn’t blending with the background be a good idea?


But not only are white buffalo rare, they don’t seem to do well.


Bison seldom if ever die of heat, but they often die of cold. The dark coat that makes the sun a nuisance in summer may be a lifesaver in winter. Bison evolved in really terrible winters; and even now, especially severe winters kill many of the old and the young. The sun is low and the days are short, but every calorie of heat absorbed from the sun is a calorie the bison does not have to manufacture from the scarce forage-forage that must be won by sweeping the snow from each bite with that heavy head-or drawn from its precious cache of calories in the form of stored fat. Like deer and elk, bison cut their energy output by losing their appetite. They eat less and produce less heat-and not just because food is scarcer in winter. Even when they can have all they want from full feeding troughs in an experimenter’s corral, they eat 30 percent less food and produce 30 percent less heat in February and March than in April and May. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

A buffalo robe was a possession prized by humans dwelling on the North American plains. It can keep you warm in a terrible storm. Cattle have replaced the buffalo, but there isn’t much point in bundling up in a cattle robe. The buffalo robe’s superiority is quite straightforward-a square inch of buffalo skin has ten times as many hairs growing from it as a square inch of cow skin. The difference, when temperatures and fat stores are low, is the difference between life and death. But when summer arrives there is a price to pay. The North American plains are a place of extreme heat as well as extreme cold. It’s a bit like jumping from the deep freeze to the frying pan, and the challenge in summer is keeping cool. The first thing the bison do is shed their winter coats. The long, twisted, almost woolly hair of winter molts, and from the front shoulder back a sleek coat of short hair is revealed. It insulates only a little, allowing the nearly ceaseless wind of North America’s grassland to blow away body heat. That surely helps; but still, the sun is hot, their dark hair absorbs its heat, and they also produce heat as they ferment their food and move around. If they couldn’t get rid of the heat they generate and the heat they accumulate, they would soon be walking pot roasts.


Bison don’t sweat, but they breathe, and lots of animals, again including humans, lose heat by evaporating water in their lungs. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

Evaporative cooling works well, but it has one major cost. You have to go through a lot of water in order that a lot of water can go through you. That internal supply must be replenished regularly. Surely the bison can do something to reduce the number of trips to water. Of course they could find some shade, but they don’t seem much inclined to. It’s astonishingly common to see them lying in the hot sun only twenty feet from dense shade.


Bison wallow in the summer, especially during the middle of the day. Wallowing puts soil into and onto their coat. They can work so much nice, dry, powdery soil into their coat that as they walk away from the wallow it cascades down, jarred loose by each step. Like most old-timey bison watchers, I have always thought they were wallowing to make their hair a lousy place for lice and other parasites. I still think that’s likely, but wallowing may also lower their heat load. Elephants have a heat problem much like bison have, and we know that a good coat of dirt is one of their solutions. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison There was a witness, the dead bull himself, and though he was silenced 36,000 years ago, he has testified through the forensic skills of the paleontologist Dale Guthrie. He is not one of the anonymous dead; he has a name: Blue Babe. He is here to tell his story because after the lions killed him and made a meal of his hump, a mud slide buried him. The mud froze, and the mud and Blue Babe remained frozen until a gold miner washed away the mud and revealed the mummy one July day in 1979. Copper precipitation had given Blue Babe’s hide a blue tint and his hump had gone to fill the lions’ stomachs, but the rest of him was remarkably well preserved. The tooth and claw marks in his hide were still so clear that Dale could take an American lion’s skull, place its canine teeth on the marks left by the killer’s canines, and see a perfect match. Even the flesh was so well preserved that when the corpse had yielded all its secrets Dale and his colleagues made an acceptable stew with a bit of the meat. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

Blue Babe was a Bison prisons-at least two phylogenetic steps back from today’s Bison bison. He was very like his ancestors that came to North America from Siberia. It wasn’t a long journey. When the route was dry, bison could have walked from Siberia to Alaska in three or four days.


Bison branched off from the primitive cow family line-Leptobos-about a million years ago. The first bison were small-bodied, small-horned, fast-moving residents of forest edges and meadows. Gradually the bison line became northern specialists, able to live where other cattle couldn’t. They also became open grassland specialists. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

A question springs to mind. Was there enough grass in North America to feed 100 million bison? Or, as an ecologist would put it, “What was the carrying capacity of the whole area bison lived in?” In still other words, what’s the biggest population the continent’s bison habitat could have supported? That won’t tell us how many were there-it just sets an upper limit;


In 1972 the zoologist Tom McHugh determined carrying capacity by starting with the total area of the central grasslands, 1,250,000 square miles, then took “a range manager’s” approach to keeping livestock numbers within carrying capacity. Using existing formulas developed for cattle, McHugh calculated conservatively to take dry years into account. He assumed that carrying capacity varied from 1 buffalo per 10 acres in the tall grass prairie just west of the Mississippi to 1 per 45 acres in the short-grass prairie just east of the Rocky Mountains. He got an overall average of 25 acres per buffalo, or 26 buffalo per square mile. That gives the Great Plains a carrying capacity of 32 million bison. McHugh deducted 4 million for competing grazers-pronghorn, elk, and prairie dogs-and added 2 million for bison living elsewhere, for a final estimate of a maximum of 30 million buffalo on the continent in primitive times.


Mary Meagher, a Park Service biologist who has studied Yellowstone’s bison for more than 40 years, has seen several winters kill 20% of the population. A bison population can have much bigger busts than booms. In fact, no bison population has ever grown faster than 20 percent a year even when it had zero predation and negligible winter kills. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison About all we can confidently say is that primitive America’s bison population was probably less than 30 million-perhaps, on average, 3 to 6 million less. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

GRASSLAND ECOLOGY From southern Alberta to central Texas, from the Rocky Mountains to the Mississippi River, a sea of grass covered the middle of North America-the area called the Great Plains covered 15 percent of the entire continent. The bulk of primitive America’s bison population lived there. Plants conform to a simple general rule: where the clouds bring more water as rain and snow than the sun and wind can evaporate in an average year, trees grow. Grass grows where there is at least half as much precipitation as the sun and wind can evaporate. If there is so little precipitation or so much evaporation that grass can’t grow, you are standing in a desert. In a temperate climate like that of the American Prairie, a very rough rule of thumb is that more than ten but less than forty inches of precipitation per year makes for a grassland. But while fourteen inches might be plenty in northern Montana, it might be too little in southern Texas. The American Prairie is doubly rooted in the Rocky Mountains. The rise of the Rockies created a rain shadow favoring grassland over forest, and the soils the grasses grow in came largely from the Rockies. About half the original mass of today’s Rocky Mountains has eroded. Water, often in the form of ice, did most of the eroding, and moving water carried many of the eroded particles east as far as the looth meridian of longitude. The looth meridian lies just east of Pierre, South Dakota, and hits Dodge City, Kansas, almost dead center-about halfway across the central plains. But there was another great conveyor belt at work too: moving air-the prairie winds. Loess is wind-borne silt. The prevailing westerlies carried loess to and beyond the Mississippi. Nebraska and Kansas were almost completely covered by a thin layer (less than five feet deep) of loess. Take away plant cover and roots, stir the loess, and it’s ready to   ? 82 ? move again. What wind brings, the wind can take away. It was loess that the westerlies carried from the Midwest’s dust bowl to the Atlantic in the 19303. The central grassland’s native plants, along with dirt dwellers such as earthworms, modified those materials into fertile soil. But not always the same soil. Hudson Bay and the Gulf of Mexico are at sea level. The western edge of the American Prairie, just east of the foot of the Rocky Mountains, is nearly a mile high, and, located in the Rocky Mountains’ rain shadow, pretty dry. Every mile downslope, to the east, it’s lower, wetter, and warmer and the soil is darker-from brown in the west through chestnut to black at the eastern edge of the prairie. Ecologists divide the American Prairie into three regions, each named for its predominant grass. Other things being equal, the closer to the Rockies a given location is, the less rain it receives and the shorter its grass. At the foot of the Rockies-say Denver, Colorado, or Billings, Montana-you’re at the western edge of the short-grass prairie. Travel east to Kansas’s western border, and you’ll find the short-grass prairie blending with the mixed-grass prairie. It’s a blurred and shifting border, not at all precise, but nevertheless important. The mixed-grass prairie attracted more bison than either of the other two. It covered all but the eastern edge of the north-south tier of states starting with North Dakota and extending through South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma and into central Texas. The tall grass prairie lies between the mixed-grass prairie and the Mississippi. During a long drought-say eight to ten years-the short-grass prairie moves east as its dry-adapted plants outcompete the taller, thirstier tall grass prairie plants. When the rain returns, the mixed-grass boundary region shifts west again. Dividing the central grasslands into sections can make each seem small. It helps to remember that the short-grass prairie alone is about the size of western Europe. The American Prairie’s grasses are deeply and broadly rooted in the soil: established for the long run. They’re perennials-their root systems are designed not for months but for decades. Only 10 percent of growth is above ground in leaves and seeds; 90 percent of growth is in the roots, and each plant sends about three-fourths of its carbon below ground into its roots. With so much energy stored below ground, the plant can persist   ? 83 ? through years-long droughts. In the wettest grassland, eight-foot-tall grasses such as Indian grass and big bluestem spread their hundreds of roots as far as six feet down into the deep black soil to tap the moisture accumulated there in past years. In the west, blue grama and buffalo grass send up stalks about ten inches tall and fill the soil below and beside them with roots outfitted with tiny hairs that absorb water from the upper thirty inches of soil, thereby capturing the moisture from even small storms.


For each buffalo the shift in weather meant hunger, less chance of reproducing, more chance of dying. For the bison as a whole it meant a shrinking population. But the dry years were what kept the prairie a grassland. If every year were wet, trees would grow, grass would go,


their bad luck was an inescapable part of the boom-and-bust cycle of all temperate grasslands. And it’s the bust part of that cycle that made sure the minerals from their bones nourished a grassland covered with living bison and not a woodland haunted by their ghosts. The wind-rippled grassland whose surface undulates from horizon to horizon strongly evokes a sea, but it’s a sea that can catch fire. Grass burns all in an instant. A dry stem glows red and turns to curling ash while you are still drawing a breath. When a wind pushes it, a prairie fire runs fast. The American Prairie has always burned.


For millions of years lightning caused combustion, but people began to burn the prairie several thousand years ago-often with buffalo in mind. Sometimes they used the flames to herd the bison, driving them to a place for easier and safer killing by people on foot. Sometimes they burned the grass so that new growth would attract bison to a more convenient killing place. Growth-stimulating fires were set in the spring when new growth would quickly replace the old. In the fall, new growth was up to six months away. Bison deserted the bare ground created by a fall fire until spring, and the people who hunted that ground faced starvation.


In tall grass prairie, where mature grasses and their litter intercept 99% of the sun’s rays before they reach the ground, fire creates a moment when a short plant’s leaves can nourish their roots. The plant community that rises from the ashes is richer in species and more complex. The grasses surge back from their roots-the soil two inches down would not have been warmed even two degrees Fahrenheit by the fire-but the new leaves are different from those whose ashes they rise through. Enough nitrogen is carried away in the smoke so that the new growth has a higher ratio of carbon to nitrogen. That makes it poorer forage than was the now-burned grass when it was newly growing, but better forage than the mature plants that burned. Fire decreases production in the short-grass prairies, where water limits growth. But in the tall grasses, where the failure of radiation to reach the soil limits growth, fire increases production. Fire interacts with grazing. In the mixed-grass prairie, little bluestem presents grazers with an in-your-face defense-stiff tillers (stalks) that the grazer must push through to get to the green leaves. Fire removes the tillers, and bison, which avoid tillered little bluestem, graze the new-growing little bluestem as readily as other grasses. The fire that consumed little bluestem’s defenses thus helped little bluestem’s competitors through the mechanism of bison grazing. The grasslands are as much creatures of the grazers as the grazers are creatures of the grasslands. Other, smaller, grazers also played a role. Grasshoppers, for example, were always present, and occasionally a tidal wave of Rocky Mountain locusts would roll east with the westerly wind, eating every blade of grass in a swath a hundred miles wide and hundreds of miles long. And below the surface nematodes, nibbling at the roots, ate more grass than everything else put together. Still, in their heyday, bison were big on the plains-big enough to be called a keystone species. Grassland has a reciprocal relationship with bison, though the reciprocity is somewhat roundabout. Bison aren’t very picky, but given the choice they will choose grass over forbs (i.e., herbs other than grass). That small preference makes a big difference to the grassland. In the tall grass prairie, grazing bison keep the dominant tall grasses such as big bluestem and Indian  grass short enough so other species can also grow. Consequently there are more plants representing more species where bison graze. Grasses resist being eaten. The tall grasses outgrow the grazers. In a few weeks they become tough, unpalatable, and protein poor. In the West, where there isn’t enough water to outgrow the grazers, buffalo grass employs the opposite strategy. It grows too short to be grazed easily, keeping its leaves low and tucking them back and down where they’re hard to reach. Grazing costs the grazed grasses much of their leaf structure-the photosynthetic, energy-producing part of the plant-and the plants react. They boost the photosynthesis of the remaining and replacement leaves to compensate. In the short term this strategy makes up for the lost tissue. In the long term there’s no free photosynthesis: the grasses boost their short-term output by dipping into their capital of stored nitrogen, and as that gets drawn down they’re less and less able to compensate. They need about two years’ rest to recharge their carbohydrate and nitrogen batteries from a big draw-down. Bison affect species composition in two ways. First, they wander. When they had the whole prairie to wander over, particular patches of grass probably had two-year rests fairly regularly, especially as bison choose areas where grasses are growing most vigorously. When the tall grass canopy is grazed off, the sunlight reaches the earth and the shorter plants do better. There are fewer individuals of more species after grazing-just as after fire. But grazing-stimulated growth in the western short grasses tends to eclipse smaller plants. Grazed short-grass prairie has more individuals of fewer species. Second, bison don’t just take away. They give something back-fertilizer. From a prairie plant’s point of view, urine is a bath of nitrogen dissolved in water-the answer to its prayers. The grasses’ leaves and stems would have eventually decomposed and returned the nitrogen to the soil, but after a longer delay and in a form that the plant would spend more energy using. Bison drawn to the close-clipped, nitrogen-rich grass in colonies of black-tailed prairie dogs leave a disproportionate amount of their digestive by-products there, thus transferring nitrogen from the rest of the prairie soil to prairie dog towns. Bison don’t just graze and eliminate on a prairie, they also wallow and die there. The soil from the wallow probably gets rid of some insects, possibly reduces the bison’s heat load, and certainly changes 75 to 150 square feet of habitat for the prairie plants. Wallowing lays the soil bare and compacts it. The compacted bowl of soil holds rainwater, creating a microenvironment in which seeds can sprout and seedlings of plants-sedges and rushes in tall grass prairie-that are otherwise rare on the prairie can grow. Some of these seeds are blown in by the prairie winds, others are carried there in the coats of the wallowing bison-perhaps picked up in another wallow. Bison maintain old wallows for years. Ecologists have even found wallow-shaped and -sized depressions in prairie soil 125 years after the last bison left a locality.


More than 99% of the tall grass prairie has been plowed; most of the world’s corn and much of its wheat grow there. The more arid the land, the less of it has been plowed. About 42 percent of mixed-grass prairie and about 29% of short-grass prairie have been converted either to cropland or to nonnative grass pastures. The native perennial grasslands made soil; an annual grassland spends it. A clump of native perennial bunchgrass eighteen inches across may have two miles of roots. They cling to the soil and it clings to them. That’s not true of many of the domesticated grasses that have been planted in its place-wheat, oats, barley, and corn are annual plants. They have evolved a radically different strategy. They live only long enough to produce a single crop of seeds. Instead of storing energy in their roots, they put it into their seeds. Since those are the parts of grasses we humans generally use most, we prefer annuals. But their roots are minimal, die each year, and don’t hold much soil. Raising cereal crops on the Great Plains trades soil for seeds. Today’s annual grasslands are spending the capital that the native grasslands had banked. Grain growers have ways to slow the erosion-crop rotation; cultivation that follows the hill’s contours; the alternation of strips of crop with strips of fallow, moisture-accumulating soil plowed at ninety degrees to the wind-but nothing yet stops it, let alone reverses it. Despite all the arts of modern agriculture, on most of the plains west of the looth meridian a money profit is possible only by running a soil deficit. It’s still possible for a few people to make a living most years, and to feed many more from the dwindling soil. But someday-someday soon in much of Great Plains country-there will be too little soil to produce food profitably. What then? Some people have a vision in which sizable parts of it go back to feeding buffalo, and they want to do it before so much soil is gone that the land will be barren.


A domestic line of bison would be gentler on the short-grass prairie than either wheat or cattle. They’ll walk further for food and trample stream banks less; even the more cup-shaped bottoms of their hooves shift the soil they step on a bit instead of just compressing it. Through them the grassland can produce food without being plowed, and thus without being washed away. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

this development won’t do anything for the bison as a wild animal. If it isn’t done right it could harm wild bison. We must insulate wild bison by isolating them from domesticated bison. One place to do it right is in a Great Plains grassland park. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison At the top stands the alpha wolf, tyrant of all, tyrannized by none. A step below is the beta, tyrannizing all but the alpha and tyrannized only by him. At the bottom is a wolf that tyrannizes none and is tyrannized by all. It eats last, if at all, and is casually bullied by all other pack members many times each day. For those at the bottom of the hierarchy it’s a dog’s life in the worst sense. But that’s my perspective-the perspective of a Jacksonian democrat, focused on the underwolf. Viewing wolves from it is, in an important sense, simply silly. Judging wolves by our standards is as foolish as judging ourselves by theirs. The lone wolf is a romantic figure but a biological dead end, so even underwolves stay with the pack. They have no choice. For wild wolves, loyalty is life.


The other members of the pack, who are nearly always the dominant pair’s siblings or offspring, are the attending adults. For the subordinate, membership in the pack holds out the possibility of promotion to a top spot. Meanwhile aunts and uncles or brothers and sisters bring food back to the den and baby-sit the growing pups. Caring for pups born to their parents or siblings increases the representation of the family genetic complement in the next generation, so they’re also having a bit of reproductive success, though diluted by the distance of their kinship. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

Wolves can kill cows, and do in the winter. They can even kill a bull in winter. But cows and bulls can injure or kill wolves. If a wolf is to make its living killing bison, it must choose a bison to kill every few days for the rest of its life.


Mature bison bulls are 2,000-pound athletes with sharp horns, hooves like sledgehammers, and a very short fuse. Their hide is thick, tough, inedible, and hard to chew through to get to the animal’s edible parts.


In Wood Buffalo Park, where the wolves live largely on bison, they kill only calves right through the summer. By fall half or more of each spring’s calves have fed wolves. It’s not likely that the wolves are doing this population some good by weeding out the unfit, unless being young and unlucky is a form of unfitness. The calves being weeded out are the unlucky plus, perhaps, a few that are a little short of specifically wolf-resistant traits-for example, always keeping somebody else between you and the wolves, or always having a tough and resourceful adult at your side. When mixed herds-cows and bulls together-travel, cows and their calves tend to journey in the safest area, front and center. Many of the survivors owe their lives to an alert and aggressive mother. She may have had help with her wolf problem, though probably not from another cow. When the wolves come it’s usually every cow for her own calf. But occasionally she can get help from bulls. During a marathon standoff in Wood Buffalo Park, four wolves spent eleven hours trying to kill the one calf in a small herd-the calf’s mother and fifteen bulls. Time and again the cow led the calf to, or the calf on its own ran to, one or more bulls. The bulls then charged the wolves, and sometimes surrounded and accompanied the calf. In the end, although the wolves were able to get their teeth on the calf eleven times, it was very much alive-even frisky-the next day. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison During the 11-hour siege in Wood Buffalo Park it was young bulls-too young to breed in the coming rut, let alone to have bred in last year’s rut-that most kept the wolves at bay. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

the male I’m watching will eat the insects the bison flushes rather than feeding them to its babies, and the females accompanying the feet and muzzles of nearby bison will do the same. As their eggs become ready to lay, female buffalo birds scout around for a place to lay them in already feathered nests containing newly laid eggs-always of another species, because buffalo birds don’t make nests. So they lay their eggs in the nests of strangers who, if luck holds, will incubate their eggs and feed their babies. The bird people call such birds brood parasites, and they show up in the best of families. English cuckoos always display this behavior. Black ducks always do it. Goldeneye ducks sometimes do it. It’s an intriguing way of life, but it has its hazards. Some of the nest owners recognize the bad egg and toss  it out. But for the buffalo birds the approach gets around a big problem. Bison can travel tens of miles overnight; for the birds, that changes a five-minute trip to the corner grocery to a long search for a new food source that may be hours away. Buffalo bird nestlings need to eat most of their weight every day. The logistics of depending on beater buffalo for food makes rearing your brood yourself a chancy business. So traveling with the herd and being a brood parasite go together nicely.


A buffalo bird that has never heard the song can sing it. But there are many ways to sing any song, and he is open to suggestions. In fact, he is looking for them. He perches a foot or so from a female, fixes an intense gaze on her, and sings his song, first this way, then that, trying out styles. The song is short. At its end the female usually sits unmoved, and he sings again in a different style. But once in a while she flips a wing, ever so slightly, at the end of the song. The male is mildly electrified. He quickly repeats the song she just flipped over; and when she flips a few more times after hearing it, that becomes the song he sings.  With his song style perfected, he seems well launched on the royal road to romance, or at least the freeway to fertilization. But the song may get vetted one more time-by his bachelor buddies. He sings his song around them too. It may be a multipurpose song, saying he’s a fighter as well as a lover. His buddies’ reaction depends on his status. If he is the dominant male in the group, they just listen. But if he’s not, those that dominate him attack, and they keep on attacking after each song until he sings a less effective song-one that females are less likely to flip over. This second vetting biases the breeding toward the dominant males, because the songs a female flips to are the songs she will stand for when the singer tries to mount her and fertilize her eggs as they form.


A bison’s big body is the largest repository native to North America of the sun’s energy converted to flesh and blood. The size and numbers of their bodies made bison too big a resource to ignore, and many creatures have found a way to get a bit of the sun’s energy by tapping into the bison’s store. True, their sheer bigness thwarts many-coyotes, say, and even wolves-that might try to harvest this stored energy. But predators aren’t the only exploiters of bison. Like all big organisms they are a resource for hundreds of kinds of tiny life forms that use them in a variety of intriguing ways. And size is no protection at all from very small things-it just makes you a bigger target. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison Brucella abortus takes its species name from one of the ways it uses its host’s life to get its young into the next generation: it sometimes causes abortion. The infection is called brucellosis, and the fact that some wild bison have it is at the swirling center of disputes about how wild bison should be managed-indeed disputes about whether or not there should be any wild bison. Brucella abortus came to North America from Europe, inhabiting domestic cattle, and first began to inhabit bison in Yellowstone Park around 1917. It now infects many individuals of the two largest herds of wild bison remaining-those in Yellowstone Park in the United States and those in Wood Buffalo Park in Canada.


Every winter hundreds, sometimes many hundreds, of bison are shot on Yellowstone’s western boundary. This policy is designed to prevent their exposing to brucellosis the cattle that graze every summer on the largely public lands that surround Yellowstone.


Brucellosis can infect a wide range of mammals, some birds, and even some insects, but it tends to die out in most species. It’s transmitted from one species to another when an animal eats forage contaminated by an aborted fetus or contacts the fetus itself. The fluids in a colonized cow’s aborted fetus are loaded with B. abortus-billions of microbes in a tea-spoonful. Any mammal that gets these fluids in its mouth, nose, or even eyes can be infected. (Humans are a secondary host. We develop a fluctuating fever called “undulant fever”-my father’s mother got it as a child by drinking unpasturized milk.)


Brucellosis is not a catastrophic disease. Except for the occasional abortion, its symptoms are mild to nonexistent in infected cows, and it poses no meaningful threat to humans today. Cattle, elk, and bison all have the potential to transmit brucellosis to one another, and elk-to-cattle transmission has been demonstrated in a few cases. Brucellosis has been eliminated from cattle by testing every animal, destroying those that test positive, and vaccinating calves-usually just the female calves.


ticks use bison as a place to grow up. From the tick’s point of view, a buffalo is an effectively infinite bucket of blood from which, once you manage to insert your straw, you can suck a lifetime’s supply of nourishment. But first you have to catch your buffalo. It’s not easy being a tick, and few quests are successful. It’s mostly a waiting game. Take a larva’s first step: find a place where a buffalo will pass within reach of your front legs. On a prairie, the tip of a tall stem of grass is a good bet. Climb to the tip and hang on until either your minute supply of body moisture dries out, turning you into a tiny cornflake, or your prey brushes against your perch and you grab on. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

the ticks must manage to hang on despite not being at all welcome. They’re serious parasites, after all-a single tick growing to maturity on a farmer’s calf costs the calf a pound and a half in growth. So the tick’s targets resist. A buffalo’s first line of defense is the hair coat that stands between the tick and its skin, and even for a tiny larva-the form winter ticks arrive in-this is a formidable barrier. Bison are very hairy. They have more primary hairs per square inch than any other members of their family-ten times as many as cattle-and a woolly undercoat as well. So even with a firm grip on the bison’s hair, the tick is on the outside trying to get in. Time is short because bison do many things that tend to terminate the relationship. The bison’s second line of defense is good grooming. They wallow, covering the tick with suffocating dust or scraping it off on the soil. They rub against trees or bushes, challenging the tick’s grip. They scratch their neck and head, even reaching between their horns, with their hind feet. And, probably the most formidable defense of all, the tongue or teeth sweep across the hair on paths dozens of ticks wide. It’s a wonder that any ticks break through to safety. In fact, few do. Bison have a small fraction of the ticks suffered by elk or moose living in the same habitat. Desperate as things are for a tick that grabs a mature bull or cow, they are much worse for the tick that happens to hitch its hopes to a calf.


Calves groom up to sixteen times as much as adults. It’s not because they have the energy to spare, it’s because they don’t have the energy to spare. A tick takes the same amount of energy from any bison, but that’s a much larger proportion of a calf’s total energy. The smaller the animal, whether it belongs to a small species or is simply young, the greater the relative cost per tick and the more vigorously the host employs anti-tick strategies. Hence, among bison, calves are the most inhospitable hosts. But bison can’t spend all their time defending themselves from ticks. They have to budget their time and energy to cover a lot of essential activities. How do they know how much time and energy to spend attacking ticks in each season?


the pronghorn buck vocalist was “Graybuck,” a male in the prime of life. When he came to a patch of bare ground a couple of feet long and half as wide he sniffed it, pawed it with one forefoot, straddled it, and urinated in it. Then he stepped forward to defecate in the same spot, showering down a handful of pellets that came to rest among hundreds of others he’d already dropped there. Those pellets were all his and, in a certain sense, that place was his.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison He patrolled its boundaries, chased away intruders, and put his smell on it. In fact, to a more sensitive nose than ours, the place must have fairly reeked of him. Besides his urine and feces, he made it smell of him by anointing some of the plants with musky oil from a gland in his cheek. He’d take a tall stalk of mullein or goat weed into his mouth and then, having wet it, apply his scent from his cheek gland. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison it’s a safe bet that another pronghorn inhales a wealth of information from both the marked plant and the pawed dirt: who left the scent, how long ago, maybe even something about his physiological state-and the warning that any other males will be challenged here. The males had started all this in spring, and they would keep it up until September. Then, during a frantic two weeks, each mature female will take an interest in sex for a few hours-for the male attending the group just then, a moment worth seizing.


why make a big to-do about a particular area?


a pronghorn is picky-and has to be. Small bodies need less food, but they also need better food: more protein, fewer carbos, less lignin. Generally, the smaller a warm-blooded animal is, the more of its body’s warmth is lost to the air and, to compensate, the higher its basal metabolism must be. There is such a thing as a better class of grass. The growing part has more protein. So younger is better and the part nearest the roots is better, but what makes life possible for the pronghorn is a supply of forbs-small broadleaf plants growing among the grasses. They have more protein and less lignin. The pronghorn picks them out, one or two at a time, from the surrounding grass. From a field that’s 95 percent grass and 5 percent forbs, a pronghorn will eat half grass and half forbs.


Pronghorn have a narrow mouth that selects plants one at a time. The pronghorns’ perspective on forbs makes their relationship to a grassland very different from the bison’s. For the bison it’s just grass going on forever, but for the pronghorn there are patches of forbs growing among the grasses-more forbs in lower-lying, wetter ground and fewer on higher, drier, sunnier ground. The amount of food in such a patch is small, but so is a pronghorn. These patches make some parts of the grassland more attractive to pronghorn than other parts. Females spend more time in the better patches; so the better the patches the male defends, the better his chances of being the only male in the right place at the right time.


When the wind blows, its speed at the top of the mound is faster than at the ground-level entrance because the friction of ground and grass slows the wind so much that it’s significantly faster just a few inches above the surface. Prairie dogs shape the soil excavated from the burrow into a wide chimney that opens several inches-occasionally as much as two feet-above the surface at the front entrance. The faster wind over this chimney draws stagnant air out of the burrow, pulling fresh air in through the   ? 128 ? soil-level entrance. The air is fresh whenever the wind blows, and on the Great Plains that’s most of the time. These chimneys of soil draw buffalo as well as air. Bison go to a lot of effort to fill their hair with soil-probably it drives out insects, possibly it keeps them cool. And there’s nothing like a good rub on a prairie dog mound. Then there’s that really green grass. Prairie dogs are as much addicted to staying home as bison are to roaming. They both eat grass; but by grazing the same few square yards every day, prairie dogs keep the grass


and shorter grass is better grass. The closer the blade is to the roots, the higher the percentage of protein and the lower the percentage of cellulose it contains. Closely cropped grass is a necessity for prairie dogs and a treat for bison. So bison spend a lot of time in prairie dog towns, enjoying a snack, rolling on a mound or two, and resting and ruminating. The relationship appears pretty one-sided so far. Bison mangle the mounds and eat some of the short grass-they are vandals and breadbasket burglars. But bison also bring something to the party-or, more precisely, leave something: grass processed into fertilizer form. It’s an excellent source of nitrogen. The longer bison hang around the prairie dog town the more they distribute there, and the more they distribute the greener the grass grows. Of course, buffalo chips don’t produce a fertilizing effect as quickly as, say, Miracle-Gro, so the bison are a little like a dinner guest bringing a bottle of wine so new it must be aged a few years to be palatable. Still, prairie dog towns stay put for generation after generation, and buffalo chips are a gift that keeps on giving. Buffalo urine is good for the grass too, and it takes effect right away. But perhaps the bison’s biggest contribution to prairie dog towns is to make them possible. Everywhere but in the western short-grass region, prairie dogs depended on bison to get the grass short enough for them to live there. Prairie dogs won’t live in tall grass. Tall grass is less nutritious, and it also hides approaching predators. Where the taller grasses grew, the founding grazers of most prairie dog towns were bison.


The pups that get to the surface are survivors. Some, perhaps many, pups are killed in their nursery, and the most likely suspect is an aunt, an older sister, or their maternal grandmother. John Hoogland has probably spent more time studying prairie dogs than any human alive or dead, and he reckons 20 to 25% of all pups are killed by 1 of these female relatives before they ever see the light of day. The female relatives are fingered as suspects because of a great deal of circumstantial evidence. They have the opportunity-their burrows are closest to the putative victims’ and they have the best chance to slip into the burrow while the mother is feeding in the grass. They have the means-the two long, sharp front teeth that are part of the definition of a rodent. And, Hoogland argues, they have a motive-they don’t just kill the pups, according to his dark scenario, but they also eat them, thus turning their victims’ bodies into milk for their own hungry pups.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison A rattlesnake can’t hide on the putting-green surface of a prairie dog town, and it quickly finds itself fang to face with a resident prairie dog. A lone prairie dog may simply retreat, but is more likely to announce the visitor by barking (hence the name “dog”) or jump-yipping: flinging itself upright on its hind legs and yipping. Adults bark when the visitor is acutely dangerous-for example, a coyote or golden eagle-and jump-yip when it isn’t. They generally jump-yip to announce snakes. A bark usually sends other dogs scurrying for their burrows, but a jump-yip usually draws a crowd. Now it’s less clear who the hunter is. The prairie dogs fling soil in the snake’s face, turning their backs and kicking with their hind feet. They may dart to its tail, bite deeply into its flesh, then leap away out of range of its answering strike.


A big snake’s rattle is lower pitched, and a warm snake rattles faster. The bigger the snake and the warmer the snake the more dangerous the snake-and the ground squirrels were most intimidated by the playback of the large snake rattling when warm, and least intimidated by the small snake rattling when cold.


After tutoring by prairie dog parents-perhaps even before-prairie dog pups flinch at a rattlesnake’s sound. Imagine one setting off to explore the neighborhood, perhaps going down a nearby burrow and hearing from the darkness that rattling warning. Time to retreat. Yet how odd. Why would a rattlesnake-which takes such risks to get close to young prairie dogs-warn one away? Rattlesnakes bear their young alive and mothers are attentive and fiercely defensive. So it could be a mother defending her vulnerable newborns in a borrowed burrow. But sometimes the rattle is produced by a pseudo-snake, a very distant relative that has come to make the same sound: an owl. A burrowing owl, to be exact-a branch of the owl family that lives on the plains as the squirrels do, in burrows. So we call them burrowing owls, but “borrowing owls” would be a better name. They don’t dig, they just move into an available burrow and set up housekeeping. Having no sword to rattle, they just rattle. It’s as if a mouse being chased by a weasel took on the guise of a hawk.


though we knew how it sounded to us-the pulse rate is that of a warm rattlesnake and the pitch that of a big rattlesnake-we didn’t know how it sounded to the animals it must be directed at. All ground squirrels will eat eggs or baby birds, so any of them would be part of the target audience. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison

We were in western Montana, mountain country, where a ground squirrel related to the prairie dog lives. Likely the badger was enlarging the ground squirrel’s burrow rather than starting a hole from scratch. Still, a badger is several times the size of a squirrel and needs a hole in the ground several times as big. And yes, they can dig. They are, more or less, carnivorous digging machines. Short, powerful limbs. Long, strong claws. A wedge-shaped head. No noticeable neck. Give the above assemblage a motor and an appetite and it will feed itself, digging ground squirrels out of their burrows. Out on the Great Plains that means prairie dogs.   ? 134 ? Badgers are members of a family of small carnivores that includes mink, marten, ferrets, weasels, wolverines, otters, and skunks. Every member of the family eats meat and they all have musk glands that emit noxious odors in self-defense. Hence the family name, the Mustelidae. It’s a big, diverse, and pretty bloodthirsty family. But though badgers are from a big family, they’re not big on family. Behavioral ecology theory predicts most small carnivores will be solitary, and American badgers conform emphatically. (European badgers don’t, but that’s another genus, another diet-mostly earthworms-and another story.)


coyote may have teamed up with the digging badger and be waiting to snap up aboveground escapees.


The coyote was always the initiator, and often started with the same pitch the family dog uses to get something going-the play bow accompanied by some tail wagging and exaggerated sideways scampering. Pulls you in every time, right? It’s not surprising that the often gregarious coyote has the pitch in its repertoire-it has been using it on other coyotes since it was a pup. But it’s astonishing that the badger should respond to it.


the badger responds to the coyote. Both bounce about a bit, then, cautiously, they touch noses. After that, it seems each can safely turn its back to the other and go about its end of their joint business. While they lasted, these relationships were as transforming as falling in love. Not only did badger and coyote tolerate one another, but when they took a break from hunting they lay down together-sometimes even touching. But these were not long-term commitments. Few such partnerships lasted more than a couple of hours. Afterward, each animal went back to its solo strategy, with the highly specialized badger pursuing its one method-dig and devour.


On the desert of the southwestern United States and northern Mexico, coyotes are small and solitary. They wander widely, mostly at night, snapping up mice and moths and daintily removing the fruit from prickly pear cactus in season.


In the snows of Alberta’s Rocky Mountains coyotes may form packs, probably of relatives, and kill grown mule deer. The bigger the coyote and the more help it has, the better its chances of killing a deer several times its own size. Food packets big enough to share are big enough to be worth stealing, and a group can more effectively defend a parcel than an individual. Family packs at Jackson Hole, Wyoming, get most of their food from really big parcels-elk that die from wounds or old age every winter. The family packs defend these carcasses from other family packs. These packs are organized like wolf packs. One pair breeds and the others, mostly their adult offspring, help raise the pups. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison What was probably the last buffalo hide hunt in Texas, in 1879, killed only twelve buffalo.


Ferrets  A grizzly digging for a prairie dog would be visible to the naked eye a country mile away. A badger doing the same work would be in plain sight for at least 200 yards. But the badger has a slender cousin that slips into a prairie dog tunnel during the night without displacing a spoonful of earth.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison this masked westerner is itself a cutthroat that invades towns on the prairie and kills and devours the residents-sometimes, in a small town, down to the last dog.


Long, low, and slender, they find prairie dog tunnels to be just their size. So they simply move into a home a dog has dug, evict or eat any occupants, and snooze away the days when most of the animals that would eat them are active, emerging mostly at night to convert the occupants of the neighboring burrows into entrees. Like other weasels, they eat both summer and winter, so a family of ferrets can make a big dent in the numbers of their immediate neighbors. When the Grand Duke Alexis safaried on the Great Plains, there were billions of prairie dogs and likely hundreds of thousands of black-footed ferrets. But the species is a victim of its own successes, combined with our excesses. Natural selection molded it, body and behavior, into a prairie dog-killing machine; but in giving the ferret that singular success, natural selection pruned away all its other options. Prairie dog towns are the only communities where it can find work, and we have poisoned and shot so many dogs, and plowed under so many dog towns, that black-tailed prairie dogs will probably soon be listed as an endangered species. The black-footed ferret has become perhaps the rarest and most endangered mammal on earth. And while bison and black-footed ferrets once lived together on most of the vast North American Great Plains, today there isn’t even an acre left where they do.


I sat with my mother’s father after her funeral. He had grown up on a ranch in Oklahoma when it was a territory and became a veterinarian, first working with livestock in South Dakota, then with wild animals for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. He loved animals and he understood them. And he made me understand how my mother came to be killed by one of the family horses. “Joyce never understood horses,” he said. “She thought Smoky was her friend-would look out for her.” But Smoky had thrown himself backward while she sat in the saddle, and had driven the saddle horn into her heart. Before you try to be friends with any animal, take a close look at how it treats its other acquaintances, because chances are good that that’s how it will treat you. Few animals have much social flexibility. They assign each individual they encounter to one of a small number of categories: members of other species are predators, competitors, or neutral nonentities. Your dog may treat both you and your cat as members of its pack, but treat your neighbor as an intruding member of another pack and your neighbor’s cat as prey. The neighbor’s cat will likely treat both you and your dog as predators, and your neighbor’s dog is likely to treat you as your dog treats its master. Being a neutral nonentity has a lot to recommend it. If you avoid getting trampled in the rush to be a neutral nonentity, your problems still aren’t over. Any change in your behavior, or in the beast’s mood, can easily lead to reassignment to a more dangerous status. Stepping toward, reaching out toward, speaking to, can change you into … what? A predator to be defended against? A social upstart to be put in place? Hooves and horns are for dealing with both, and when they’re wielded effectively they can be lethal. Even if you don’t change, the animal’s mood may. Cowbirds often attend closely to grazing bison, feeding on the insects that the grazing flushes, and the grazer treats them as neutral nonentities. Yet I’ve seen an excited bull attack his cowbird contingent, lunging down and slamming a horn into the sod, vainly trying to gore them. The quicker birds easily escaped, preserving both their dignity and their proximity to their insect-flusher. People aren’t that quick.


One proud owner showing off his little herd of pet buffalo was suddenly lifted off his feet when his young bull’s horn entered his belly and found solid purchase in his rib cage. The man’s luck got better at that point. The upward thrust that gored him tossed him over a fence and at the feet of a visiting veterinarian. The vet kept him alive. A rancher in Idaho, Dick Clark, raised a bull from a calf, and even when it was full-grown it let him pet it and climb onto its back. It seemed real friendly. Then one day it killed him, mutilated his body, and drove away those who tried to remove the body from the corral.


The bull’s behavior caused that blood to be spilled, but behind that behavior lay the source of this double tragedy-the man’s belief that he and the bull were friends.


Converting a bison to a beast of burden means getting it to walk or run-things it normally does on its own initiative-on command, while wearing a harness or saddle and bridle. The bison resist, and the usual technique for overcoming that resistance is to be forceful; breaking them to harness or saddle is the usual term, and it’s a good description. Most animals can be socially dominated, at least temporarily and at some stages of their lives. That keeps them from getting maimed or murdered in a battle they can’t win. The breaker taps into this adaptation, asserts him or herself as the dominant in the relationship, and gets submission from the beast. People don’t tame bison to get beasts of burden, they tame them to prove either that they are tamable or that somebody has got the stuff to do it-in either case, for an audience.


Several times I have heard a grunt, the sound of expelled air and rapid hoof beats, and turned to find a mother buffalo charging. Apparently I had just been reclassified from neutral nonentity to predator, or from distant predator to too-close predator. Some authorities recommend “calling the buffalo’s bluff” by standing your ground, waving your arms, and shouting. Running away, they say, would encourage further pursuit. I’ve always run away. Calling an animal’s bluff works only if it is bluffing. If it’s not, then you’re not even a moving target. I have little confidence in my ability to intimidate an animal that will attack a pack of wolves or a grizzly bear. The cow has always turned away from my rapidly retreating back and returned to her calf.


If the mother chases one wolf very far, she leaves her calf exposed to the others. No profit, then, in running after a diminishing threat. Getting right back to the calf is a good rule of thumb, and mothers seem to follow it. In fact, in their everyday lives it pays bison to ignore just about anything that stays at a proper distance. The proper (neutral) distance varies from thing to thing and depends on the particular bison’s experience with it and momentary mood, so there’s no set rule. But more distance is always better


Natural selection shaped each bison, blood, bones, and behavior, to inhabit the center of our continent, dealing with the hunger of its predators and the competition of its fellows. As a wild animal it wasn’t selected to interact with us and it isn’t very flexible.


Even the domestication going on in some lines hasn’t gone very far. If we are to have a benign relationship with bison, we humans will have to do most of the adjusting. If we can appreciate what they really are, instead of what we want them to be, our future together can be safer and richer for us, and safer and more secure for them.


They used the same knowledge in other buffalo drives at other seasons-into a pit created by dissolving limestone; into a narrow arroyo, a corral the hunters had built of stone and wood; or even, in southern Colorado, into a sand dune. Their understanding showed, too, in the wolf hide hunt. Recipe for a successful hunt: dress and act like your quarry’s ancient and mortal enemy, and saunter up very close-being sure to stay in plain sight of your prey. It’s not obvious that it will work, but the man wearing the wolf pelt next to his dark skin and approaching the buffalo herd on his hands and knees knows something that isn’t obvious. He knows about wolves and buffalo.


He knows that only a few interactions between them are a headlong chase-most are a subtle dance. Buffalo and wolves saw a lot of each other and came to know each other well. Bison saw wolves too often to fling themselves into headlong flight every time one appeared. Wolves aren’t always hunting-sometimes they’re patrolling the boundaries of their territory. Sometimes they’re on a social errand. Even if they are hunting, they may not be hunting buffalo, especially if the hunt is undertaken alone. And even when they’re hunting buffalo, they may not be dangerous. And even if they are hungry, they don’t just fling themselves at the nearest buffalo. An adult cow weighs as much as ten wolves, an adult bull as much as eighteen or even twenty. They are quick, kick like a mule, and can drive a horn through another bull’s rib cage with one swing of the head. Wolves, even a pack of them, approaching a herd of bison are not likely to attack a healthy adult. They seek the weak-calves or sick or injured adults. Bulls and cows without calves have little to fear from a single wolf, and not enough reason to spend energy escaping it. So the healthy adult’s best move is to stay put, keep a casual eye on the wolf, and go on grazing, and that’s what it usually does-in that sense it “knows” the wolves; and the man on his hands and knees, now very close to the bison, understands the bison’s knowledge of wolves. That understanding lets him hide where grass too short to hide a robin stretches for miles. And so hidden, he draws his bow and kills a bison. The hunter was hidden in plain sight. And though the wolf’s skin lay over him, it wasn’t really the wolf’s skin that hid him, it was the bison’s understanding of-really, its adaptation to-the wolf. In this hunt, as in the jump, the hunter not only understands the bison’s behavior well enough to predict it, but understands it well enough to turn the prey’s strengths to weaknesses, its defenses to vulnerabilities.


sometimes, when the rivers froze, wolves came as a pack and drove the bison onto an expanse of winter ice, where their hard, smooth hooves had little more purchase than a man would find trying to walk on ball bearings. The bison were nearly defenseless, and even the strongest were vulnerable.


The people’s understanding of bison behavior was their most important tool. Their stone weapons and moccasined feet would have been useless without it. Their physical technology didn’t allow them to simply overpower bison. But about 300 years ago that suddenly changed. The plains dwellers began to ride horses.


The hunt that the horse made possible differed from the hunts that came before it in a very important way. It overpowered the bison’s defenses rather than exploiting them. Now it was the horse that the hunter needed to understand and manipulate, no longer the bison or the wolf. From above and behind the hunter’s horse’s head comes a whoop, round heels dig into its ribs, and a quirt lashes its hips. Be that horse for a minute or two, running, muzzle out, ears back as your hooves reach, strike sod, and reach again, one at a time but furiously, as you begin to gallop. Before you other runners, as large as or larger than you, are galloping on cloven hooves. They do not run from the quirt or the heels, they run for their lives and they are fast, but not as fast as you. Your ancestors are the hot-blooded horse breeds-Andalusian, Arabian, barb-spirited horses, always ready to run fast and far. Your species became swift and enduring on these same plains running for their lives, then humans took a hand and selected a line even faster. And so you gain on the running buffalo despite the weight on your back.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison even a buffalo horse has its limits and there will seldom be more than three buffalo. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison get another arrow fitted to the bowstring, select another buffalo to kill, guide the horse to it by the pressure of his knees, shoot for the diaphragm and lungs. All the while he is keeping track of the other hunters riding in a long skirmish line, overtaking and infiltrating the running buffalo. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison Nothing in the bison’s history had prepared it for the buffalo rifle. Danger always came at them, growing larger in their eye or louder in their ear as it grew closer. The bullet was invisible. But what about the sound? Surely the boom of those black powder rifles filled the ear like a thunderclap. Why didn’t the herd flee from the first shot instead of grazing quietly, as they often did, while dozens fell to the rifle one by one? Perhaps because the rifle filled the ear too much like a thunderclap. Thunderclaps were common where bison evolved, /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////bison That gives us a possible explanation for the boom, but leaves us with the smoke-a sudden cloud the size of a garbage can that quickly dissipated. Maybe they appeared to be dust devils. These tiny tornadoes are common on the plains. Heat sets the winds to suddenly spinning, and where they touch the earth they gather dust and dried bits of plants that are airborne for the seconds or minutes the dust devil lives;


Famine was first reported among the Comanches on the southern plains in 1800, less than 100 years after their arrival. They weren’t starving in the midst of plenty. Buffalo were sometimes scarce, for on the southern plains they were under a lot of pressure. There were many more people hunting them. They had to compete for grass with feral horses-perhaps 2 million of them. And the plains, and especially the southern plains, had drought years. Drought can reduce the primary productivity of a short-grass prairie by 90 percent, and it takes three to five years for the grass to recover. And horses brought one more change. They didn’t just increase the kill, they made it much more selective. Hunters on foot often had to take potluck so far as age or sex was concerned. But hunters on horseback could choose, and they chose cows. Cows’ meat was more edible and their hides-thinner, lighter, more pliable-were more valuable.


The effect on the bison population was devastating. Selectively hunting cows sent the population in a downward spiral. Bison cows have at most one calf per year, the first born when they are at least three years old. If the calf crop decreases but the wolf population stays the same and continues to kill the same number of calves, then the wolves will take an ever increasing percentage of each year’s calf crop. Likewise, the fewer the cows left in a population, the greater the percentage that must be taken to get an equal number of robes each year. Bulls come to predominate in the population, each eating more forage than a cow, while fewer and fewer ever contribute to reproduction.


By 1840 the harvest had risen to 100,000 robes a year. It was the first linking of steam power and bison, but not the last. The rise of steam and the decline of bison were inextricably linked-in a sense, a large part of the vast herds disappeared into the clouds of industrial steam rising in America and Europe.

Leather was in great demand just then. The industrial revolution was firing up its motive force-steam engines-in eastern North America and Europe. These industrial engines used steam to spin a wide, flat steel wheel. A long belt fitted over both the steam engine’s flat wheel and another flat wheel on the industrial machine to be powered, much like the belt with which a modern automobile engine drives its fan. Thus industrial belting was a critical link, and most industrial belts of the time were made of leather. Buffalo hides made good industrial belting.


Like wolves, wild bison still exist, but they exist as little islands in a sea of increasingly domesticated relatives-not yet cattle, but no longer wild bison. Perhaps we should call these animals that started as buffalo but will end as a kind of cattle “buffattle.” If bison domestication goes well, buffalo ranching will spread and wild buffalo will end up on islands in a sea of buffattle. We must not let them drown in that sea. It would be a terrible irony if we saved wild buffalo from the hide hunters’ Sharps rifle, then lost the species to the breeders’ bottom line. The most vivid threat today is eradication by modification.


Posted in Agriculture, Farming and Ranching | Leave a comment

Signs of Peakiness, Oil companies are running out of cash

A Big Summer Story You Missed: Soaring Oil Debt


Over 100 of the world’s largest energy companies are running out of cash. Photo of Keystone pipeline in Nebraska by Shannon Ramos. Creative Commons licensed.

Some of the summer’s biggest news stories took place in the bombed schools of Gaza, the abandoned hospitals of the Democratic Republic of Congo, the wheat fields of eastern Ukraine and the bloody mountains of northern Iraq.

But one of the most important made virtually no headlines at all, and seemed to only appear on the website of the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Last July the government agency, which has collected mundane statistics on energy matters for decades, quietly revealed that 127 of the world’s largest oil and gas companies are running out of cash.

They are now spending more than they are earning. Profits have lagged as expenditures have risen. Overburdened by debt, these firms are selling assets.

The math is simple. The 127 firms generated $568 billion in cash from their operations during 2013-2014 while their expenses totalled $677 billion. To cover the difference of $110 billion, the energy giants increased their debt load or sold off assets.

Given that the gap between earned cash and spending stood at a modest $10 billion in 2010, that’s a significant change for the industry as well as the global economy it fuels.

Mining messy bitumen

The Energy Information Administration doesn’t explain why the world’s major hydrocarbon producers are now spending more and making less. But an August report by Carbon Tracker, a non-profit financial think-tank, provides some possible answers.

Most companies are now investing in high-cost and high-risk projects to mine difficult hydrocarbons such as bitumen or shale oil, according to Carbon Tracker. Hydraulic fracturing, the land equivalent of ocean bottom trawling, adds to the cost of oil, too.

It’s not only the firms deploing fracking that are racking up high debt loads. Chinese state-owned corporations, for example, plopped down $30 billion to develop junk crude in the oilsands over the last decade.

But with a few exceptions, none of the investments are making a good dollar return due to the difficult and costly nature of mining messy bitumen as well as problematic quality of the reserves, combined with huge cost overruns.

By Carbon Tracker’s calculation, bitumen remains the world’s most expensive hydrocarbon. The extraction of this fuel signals that business as usual is over, and mining of extreme hydrocarbons comes with extreme financial and political risks.

Cheap and easy days are over

The Chinese aren’t the only ones facing diminishing returns from high-cost projects in the oilsands.

Most of the world’s oil and gas firms are now pursuing extreme hydrocarbons because the cheap and easy stuff is gone. The high-carbon remainders include shale oil, oilsands, ultra deepwater oil and Arctic petroleum. (Industry now wants to frack the Northwest Territories, too.)

But given that oil demand in places like Europe, the United States and Japan is flattening or declining, many analysts don’t think that high-carbon, high-risk projects (which all need a $75 to $95 market price for oil to break even) make much economic sense in a carbon-constrained world.

“Our analysis demonstrates that a blind pursuit of reserve replacement at all costs or a focus on high expenditure regardless of returns could go against improving shareholder returns,” recently warned Carbon Tracker.

The capital costs for liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals supplied by heavily fracked coal or shale fields is also rising. Highly complex LNG projects in Norway, Australia and Papua New Guinea have all experienced major cost overruns.

Goldman Sachs now reckons more than half of the oil companies listed on the stock market — are spending five times more than what they did in 2000 chasing extreme hydrocarbons. As a consequence they need an oil price of $120 a barrel to remain cash neutral in the future.

Spending more cash to get less energy has major implications for the global economy, a creature of oil. Whenever nations spend lots on oil, they record crazy exponential growth, like China. And whenever nations spend less on petroleum, like Europe and the U.S., there is stagnation.

Oil’s slavish hold

To explain oil’s slavish hold on the global economy, the Russian physicists Victor Gorshkov and Anastassia M. Makarieva employ a useful metaphor.

Imagine a town of 100 people. Ten own the air, the oil of the modern economy, and they force everyone else to pay to breathe. The other 90 work hard and give the air owners about 10 per cent of their production.

Whenever the price of air goes up quickly (and the cost of extracting oil has increased substantially in the last decade — about 12 per cent a year), then economic growth slows to a crawl. The air owners have killed the growth potential of the workers.

Sooner or later the owners of the air realize they have to lower the price. “As the air price goes down, the workers feel better…. This, in short, is the scenario of the global economic crisis, how it starts and how it develops,” explains Gorshkov and Makarieva. “Curiously, none of the economic analysts relate the world crisis to the abnormally high oil prices that preceded it.”

But diminished returns from extreme hydrocarbons will do more than slow down productivity and increase price volatility. They will impose lasting and material adjustments on all of us.

In addition to seeing fewer vehicles on the road (a startling U.S. reality already), we shall also see lower wages (except in the hydrocarbon industry), rising food prices, rising personal debt loads, increased demands on governments increasingly short of revenue, explosive inequalities in wealth and rising political conflict.

Our new narrative

We shall also see more of what the U.S. Energy Information Administration dutifully recorded: soaring debt loads to support massive energy sprawl. That means industry will spend more good money chasing poor quality resources. They will inefficiently mine and frack ever larger land bases at higher environmental costs for lower energy returns.

Combined with its twin brother, climate change, this is the great energy narrative that will shape our destiny in the years to come.

Marion King Hubbert, a Shell geologist, predicted this development decades ago and presented the cultural conundrum clearly: “During the last two centuries we have known nothing but an exponential growth culture, a culture so dependent upon the continuance of exponential growth for its stability that is incapable of reckoning with problems of non-growth.”

But why would such a radical development be news in the dog days of summer?

Posted in Peak Oil | 1 Comment

Who Killed the Electric Car?

Who Killed the Electric Car?  Alice Friedemann August 29, 2014

The battery did it.  Batteries are far too expensive for the average consumer, $600-1700 per kwh (Service). And they aren’t likely to get better any time soon.

“The big advances in battery technology happen rarely. It’s been more than 200 years and we have maybe 5 different successful rechargeable batteries,” said George Blomgren, a former senior technology researcher at Eveready (Borenstein).

And yet hope springs eternal. A better battery is always just around the corner:

  • 1901: “A large number of people … are looking forward to a revolution in the generating power of storage batteries, and it is the opinion of many that the long-looked-for, light weight, high capacity battery will soon be discovered.” (Hiscox)
  • 1901: “Demand for a proper automobile storage battery is so crying that it soon must result in the appearance of the desired accumulator [battery]. Everywhere in the history of industrial progress, invention has followed close in the wake of necessity” (Electrical Review #38. May 11, 1901. McGraw-Hill)
  • 1974: “The consensus among EV proponents and major battery manufacturers is that a high-energy, high power-density battery – a true breakthrough in electrochemistry – could be accomplished in just 5 years” (Machine Design).
  • 2014 internet search “battery breakthrough” gets 7,710,000 results, including:  Secretive Company Claims Battery Breakthrough, ‘Holy Grail’ of Battery Design Achieved, Stanford breakthrough might triple battery life, A Battery That ‘Breathes’ Could Power Next-Gen Electric Vehicles, 8 Potential EV and Hybrid Battery Breakthroughs,.

So why isn’t there a better battery yet?

The lead-acid battery hasn’t changed much since it was invented in 1859. It’s hard to invent new kinds of batteries or even improve existing ones, because although a battery looks simple, inside it’s a churning chaos of complex electrochemistry as the battery goes between being charged and discharged many times.

Charging and recharging are hard on a battery. Recharging is supposed to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, but over time the metals, liquids, gels, chemicals, and solids inside clog, corrode, crack, crystallize, become impure, leak, and break down.

A battery is like a football player, with increasing injuries and concussions over the season. An ideal battery would be alive, able to self-heal, secrete impurities, and recover from abuse.

The number of elements in the periodic table (118) is limited. Only a few have the best electron properties (like lithium), and others can be ruled out because they’re radioactive (39), rare earth and platinum group metals (23), inert noble gases (6), or should be ruled out: toxic (i.e. cadmium, cobalt, mercury, arsenic), hard to recycle, scarce, or expensive.

There are many properties an ideal Energy Storage device would have:

  1. Small and light-weight to give vehicles a longer range
  2. High energy density like oil (energy stored per unit of weight)
  3. Recharge fast, tolerant of overcharge, undercharging, and over-discharge
  4. Store a lot of energy
  5. High power density, deliver a lot of power quickly
  6. Be rechargeable thousands of times while retaining 80% of their storage capacity
  7. Reliable and robust
  8. A long life, at least 10 years for a vehicle battery
  9. Made from very inexpensive, common, sustainable, recyclable materials
  10. Deliver power for a long time
  11. Won’t explode or catch on fire
  12. Long shelf life for times when not being used
  13. Perform well in low and high temperatures
  14. Able to tolerate vibration, shaking, and shocks
  15. Not use toxic materials during manufacture or in the battery itself
  16. Take very little energy to make from cradle-to-grave
  17. Need minimal to no maintenance

Pick Any Two

In the real world, you can’t have all of the above. It’s like the sign “Pick any two: Fast (expensive), Cheap (crappy), or Good (slow)”.

You always give up something. Battery chemistry is complex. Anode, cathode, electrolyte, and membrane separators materials must all work together. Tweak any one of these materials and the battery might not work anymore. You get higher energy densities from reactive, less stable chemicals that often result in non-rechargeable batteries, are susceptible to impurities, catch on fire, and so on. Storing more energy might lower the voltage, a fast recharge shorten the lifespan.

You have to optimize many different things at the same time,” says Venkat Srinivasan, a transportation battery expert at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California. “It’s a hard, hard problem” (Service).

Conflicting demands. The main job of a battery is to store energy. Trying to make them discharge a lot of power quickly may be impossible. “If you want high storage, you can’t get high power,” said M. Stanley Whittingham, director of the Northeast Center for Chemical Energy Storage. “People are expecting more than what’s possible.”

Battery testing takes time. Every time a change is made the individual cells, then modules, then overall pack is tested for one cycle and again for 50 cycles for voltage, current, cycle life (number of recharges), Ragone plot (energy and power density), charge and discharge time, self-discharge, safety (heat, vibration, external short circuit, overcharge, forced discharge, etc.) and many other parameters.

Be skeptical of battery breakthroughs. It takes ten years to improve an existing type of battery, and it’s expensive since you need chemists, material scientists, chemical and mechanical engineers, electrochemists, computer and nanotechnology scientists. The United States isn’t training enough engineers to support a large battery industry, and within 5 years, 40% of full-time senior engineering faculty will be eligible for retirement.

We need a revolutionary new battery that takes less than 10 years to develop

“We need to leapfrog the engineering of making of batteries,” said Lawrence Berkeley National Lab battery scientist Vince Battaglia. “We’ve got to find the next big thing.”

But none of the 10 experts who talked to The Associated Press said they know what that big thing will be yet, or when it will come (Borenstein).

The Department of Energy (DOE) says that incremental improvements won’t electrify cars and energy storage fast enough. Scientists need to understand the laws of battery physics better. To do that, we need to be able to observe what’s going on inside the battery at an atomic scale in femtoseconds (.000000000000001 second), build nanoscale materials/tubes/wires to improve ion flow etc., and write complex models and computer programs that use this data to better predict what might happen every time some aspect of the battery is meddled with to zero in on the best materials to use.

Are you kidding? Laws of Physics? Femtoseconds? Atomic Scale? Nanoscale technology — that doesn’t exist yet?

Extremely energy-dense batteries for autos are impossible because of the laws of Physics and the “Pick any Two” problem

There’s only so much energy you can force into a black box, and it’s a lot less than the energy contained in oil – pound for pound the most energy density a battery could contain is only around 6 percent that of oil. The energy density of oil 500 times higher than a lead-acid battery (House), which is why it takes 1,200 pounds of lead-acid batteries to move a car 50 miles.

Lithium batteries are more powerful, but even so, oil has 120 times the energy density of a lithium battery pack. Increased driving ranges of electric cars have come more from weight reduction, drag reduction, and decreased rolling resistance than improved battery performance.

The amount of energy that can be stored in a battery depends on the potential chemical energy due to their electron properties. The most you could ever get is 6 volts from a Lithium (highest reduction) and Fluorine (highest oxidation).  But for many reasons a lithium-fluoride or fluoride battery is not in sight and may never work out (not rechargeable, unstable, unsafe, inefficient, solvents and electrolytes don’t handle the voltages generated, lithium fluoride crystallizes and doesn’t conduct electricity, etc.).

The DOE has found that lithium-ion batteries are the only chemistry promising enough to use in electric cars. There are “several Li-ion chemistries being investigated… but none offers an ideal combination of energy density, power capability, durability, safety, and cost” (NAS 2013).

Lithium batteries can generate up to 3.8 volts but have to use non-aqueous electrolytes (because water has a 2 volt maximum) which gives a relatively high internal impedance.

They can be unsafe. A thermal runaway in one battery can explode into 932 F degrees and spread to other batteries in the cell or pack.

There are many other problems with all-electric cars

The average car buyer wants a low-cost, long range vehicle. A car that gets 30 mpg would require a “prohibitively long-to-charge, expensive, heavy, and bulky” 78 kWh battery to go 300 miles, which costs about $35,000 now. Future battery costs are hard to estimate, and right now, some “battery companies sell batteries below cost to gain market share” (NAS 2013). Most new cathode materials are high-cost nickel and cobalt materials.

Rapid charging and discharging can shorten the lifetime of the cell. This is particularly important because the goal of 10 to 15 years of service for automotive applications, the average lifetime of a car. Replacing the battery would be a very expensive repair, even as costs decline (NAS 2013).

It is unclear that consumer demand will be sufficient to sustain the U.S. advanced battery industry. It takes up to $300 million to build one lithium-ion plant to supply batteries for 20,000 to 30,000 plug-in or electric vehicles (NAE 2012).

Almost all electric cars use up to 3.3 pounds of rare-earth elements in interior permanent magnet motors. China currently has a near monopoly on the production of rare-earth materials, which has led DOE to search for technologies that eliminate or reduce rare-earth magnets in motors (NAS 2013).

Natural gas generated electricity is likely to be far more expensive when the fracking boom peaks 2015-2019, and coal generated electricity after coal supplies reach their peak somewhere between now and 2030.

100 million electric cars require ninety 1,000-MWe power plants, transmission, and distribution infrastructure that would cost at least $400 billion dollars. A plant can take years to over a decade to build (NAS 2013).

Two-thirds of the electricity generated comes from fossil fuels (coal 39%, natural gas 27%). Six percent of electricity is lost over transmission lines, and power plants are only 40% efficient on average – it would be more efficient for cars to burn natural gas than electricity generated by natural gas. Drought is reducing hydropower across the west, and it will take decades to scale up wind, solar, and other alternative energy resources.

An even larger problem is recharge time. Unless batteries can be developed that can be recharged in 10 minutes or less, cars will be limited largely to local travel in an urban or suburban environment (NAS 2013). Long distance travel would require at least as many charging stations as gas stations (120,000).

Fast charging is bad for batteries, requires expensive infrastructure, and is likely to use peak-load electricity with higher cost, lower efficiency, and higher GHG emissions.

Battery swapping has many problems: battery packs would need to be standardized, an expensive inventory of different types and sizes of battery packs would need to be kept, the swapping station needs to start charging right away during daytime peak electricity, batteries deteriorate over time, customers won’t like older batteries not knowing how far they can go on them, and seasonal travel could empty swapping stations of batteries.

To be competitive in electrified vehicles, the United States also requires a domestic supply base of key materials and components such as special motors, transmissions, brakes, chargers, conductive materials, foils, electrolytes, and so on, most of which come from China, Japan, or Europe. The supply chain adds significant costs to making batteries, but it’s not easy to shift production to America because electric and hybrid car sales are too few, and each auto maker has its own specifications (NAE 2012).

The embodied energy (oiliness, EROEI) of batteries is enormous.

Ecological damage. Mining and the toxic chemicals used to make and with batteries pollute water and soil, harm health, and wildlife.


Borenstein, S. Jan 22, 2013. What holds energy tech back? The infernal battery. Associated Press.

Hiscox, G. 1901. Horseless Vehicles, Automobiles, Motor Cycles. Norman Henley & Co

House, Kurt Zenz. 20 Jan 2009. The limits of energy storage technology. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

(NAE 2012) National Academy of Engineering. Building the U.S. Battery Industry for Electric Drive Vehicles: Summary of a Symposium. National Research Council

NAS 2013. National Academy of Sciences. Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels. Committee on Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels; Board on Energy and Environmental Systems; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; National Research Council

Service, Robert. 24 Jun 2011. Getting there. Better Batteries. Science Vol 332 1494-96.

Posted in Batteries, Transportation | Leave a comment

The Oiliness of Everything: Invisible Oil and Energy Payback Time.

The Oiliness of Everything: Invisible Oil and Energy Payback Time.

By Alice Friedemann, August 23, 2014.

Just as fish swim in water, we swim in oil.  You can’t understand the predicament we’re in until you can see the oil that saturates every single aspect of our life.

What follows is a life cycle of a simple object, the pencil. I’ve cut and reworded Read’s I Pencil, My Family Tree to show the fossil fuel energy inputs (OBJECTS are in BOLD CAPITALS, ACTIONS are italicized).

“My family tree begins with … a Cedar tree from Oregon. Now contemplate the antecedents — all the people, numberless skills, and fabrication:

All the SAWS. TRUCKS, ROPE and OTHER GEAR to HARVEST and CART cedar logs to the RAILROAD siding. The MINING of ore, MAKING of STEEL, and its REFINEMENT into SAWS, AXES, and MOTORS.


BUILDING of LOGGING CAMPS (BEDS, MESS HALLS). SHOP for, DELIVER, and COOK FOOD to feed the working men. Not to mention the untold thousands of persons who had a hand in every cup of COFFEE the loggers drank!

The LOGS are SHIPPED to a MILL in California. Can you imagine how many people were needed to MAKE FLAT CARS and RAILS and RAILROAD ENGINES?

At the mill, cedar logs are CUT into small, pencil-length slats less than a quarter inch thick, KILN-DRIED, TINTED, WAXED. and KILN-DRIED again. Think of all effort and skills to make the TINT and the KILNS, SUPPLY the HEAT, LIGHT, and POWER, the BELTS, MOTORS, and all the OTHER THINGS a MILL requires? Plus the SWEEPERS and the MEN who POURED the CONCRETE for the DAM of a Pacific Gas & Electric Company HYDRO-ELECTRIC PLANT which supplies the mill’s POWER!


Once in the PENCIL FACTORY—worth millions of dollars in MACHINERY and BUILDING—each slat has 8 GROOVES CUT into them by a GROOVE-CUTTING MACHINE, after which the LEAD-LAYING MACHINE PLACES a piece of LEAD in every other slat, APPLIES GLUE and PLACES another SLAT on top–—a lead sandwich. Seven brothers and I are mechanically CARVED from this “wood-clinched” sandwich.

My “lead” itself—it contains no lead at all—is complex. The GRAPHITE is MINED in Sri Lanka. Consider these MINERS and those who MAKE their many TOOLS and the makers of the PAPER SACKS in which the graphite is SHIPPED and those who make the STRING that ties the sacks and the MEN who LIFT them aboard SHIPS and the MEN who MAKE the SHIPS. Even the LIGHTHOUSE KEEPERS along the way assisted in my birth—and the HARBOR PILOTS.

The graphite is mixed with CLAY FROM Mississippi in which AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE is used in the REFINING process. Then WETTING AGENTS and animal fats are CHEMICALLY REACTED with sulfuric acid. After PASSING THROUGH NUMEROUS MACHINES, the mixture finally appears as endless extrusions—as from a sausage grinder-cut to size, dried, and baked for several hours at 1,850 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. To increase their strength and smoothness the leads are then TREATED with a hot mixture which includes CANDELILLA WAX from Mexico, PARAFFIN WAX, and HYDROGENATED NATURAL FATS.

My cedar RECEIVES 6 coats of LACQUER. Do you know all the ingredients of lacquer? Who would think that the GROWERS of CASTOR BEANS and the REFINERS of CASTOR OIL are a part of it? They are. Why, even the processes by which the lacquer is made a beautiful yellow involve the skills of more persons than one can enumerate!

Observe the LABELING, a film FORMED by APPLYING HEAT to CARBON BLACK mixed with RESINS. How do you make resins and what is carbon black?

My bit of metal—the ferrule—is BRASS. Think of all the PERSONS who MINE ZINC and COPPER and those who have the skills to MAKE shiny SHEET BRASS from these products of nature. Those black rings on my ferrule are black NICKEL. What is black nickel and how is it applied? The complete story would take pages to explain.

Then there’s my crowning glory, the ERASER, a rubber-like product made by reacting RAPE-SEED OIL from Indonesia with SULFUR CHLORIDE, and numerous VULCANIZING and ACCELERATING AGENTS. The PUMICE comes from Italy; and the pigment which gives “the plug” its color is CADMIUM SULFIDE.

Does anyone wish to challenge my earlier assertion that no single person on the face of this earth knows how to make me?

Actually, millions of human beings have had a hand in my creation, no one of whom even knows more than a very few of the others. Now, you may say that I go too far in relating the picker of a coffee berry in far off Brazil and food growers elsewhere to my creation; that this is an extreme position. I shall stand by my claim. There isn’t a single person in all these millions, including the president of the pencil company, who contributes more than a tiny, infinitesimal bit of know-how. From the standpoint of know-how the only difference between the miner of graphite in Sri Lanka and the logger in Oregon is in the type of know-how. Neither the miner nor the logger can be dispensed with, any more than can the chemist at the factory or the worker in the oil field—paraffin being a by-product of petroleum.

I, Pencil, am a complex combination of miracles: a tree, zinc, copper, graphite, and so on.”

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Energy Returned on Energy Invested (EROEI)

When it comes to replacing fossil fuels with another kind of energy, you want to be sure you aren’t merely building a Rube Goldberg contraption that churns out less power over its lifetime than the fossil fuel energy used to make the device.

There are decades-old scientific methods that try do do this.  The best-known is the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which calculates the monetary costs  (though there are some LCA databases with energy used to make objects or perform actions).

When it comes to evaluating a device that produces energy, a better measurement is the Energy Returned on Energy Invested (EROEI, EROI), which subtracts the fossil fuel energy used in every step and component from how much energy is output over the lifetime of the contraption.  The higher the EROEI the better.

At the start of the fossil fuel age, for every barrel of oil discovered, 100 more could be produced – an EROEI of 100!  With just 1 percent of the energy needed to get even more oil, the other 99 percent of the energy could be used to make cars, fly around the world, make movies, electronic goods, build roads, bridges, railroads, ships, homes, heat, cook, refrigerate, air-condition, buy out-of-season food, and all the other marvelous comforts and enjoyments we take for granted.

Clearly an EROEI of 1 or less is a big problem.  If the fossil fuel energy to make ethanol has an EROEI of 1, then there is no extra energy left over to do anything else but make more moonshine. Worse yet, the EROEI of ethanol is probably negative if the boundaries are wide enough (Pimentel).  At best, the EROEI is 1.2 (Farrell), which means that society would have just .2 of low-quality extra energy left over to make the 14 billion pencils from 82,000 trees and all the other goods we use every year.

The problems with LCA and EROEI

This is insane! There are infinite regressions, since every object has its own LCA and EROEI.   A Toyota car has about 30,000 partsPer turbine assembly, a windmill has 8,000 components. In 2012 the U.S. wind industry installed over 6,700 turbines, which required 20,100 blades and tower sections, 3.2 million bolts, 36,000 miles of rebar, and 1.7 million cubic yards of concrete (AWEA).

LCA & EROEI studies are bound to miss some steps. Reed’s pencil story left out the design, marketing, packaging, sales, distribution, and energy to fuel the supply chains between  California, Oregon, Mississippi, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, etc., and the final ride the pencil takes to the garbage dump.

Every step in a process subtracts energy from  the ultimate energy delivered. Oil is concentrated sunshine that was brewed for free by Mother Nature. Building alternative energy resources requires dozens of steps, thousands of components, and vast amounts of energy in the supply chains of providing the minerals and pieces of equipment to make an alternative energy contraption.

Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) often use money rather than energy to calculate “costs”.  Money is an artificial, abstract concept used to grease the wheels of commerce. Money varies in value over time for reasons of politics, financial cycles, and can’t be burned in combustion engines.

There are many different LCA tables to choose from.  So scientists accuse each other of cherry-picking data or argue the data is out-of-date.

EROEI studies often leave out LCA monetary costs because they’re difficult to quantify as energy costs.  For example, when the EROEI of a windmill farm is calculated, many costs are left out, such as insurance, administrative expenses, taxes, the cost of the land to rent or own, indirect labor (consultants, notary public, civil servants, legal costs, etc), security and surveillance costs, the fairs, exhibitions, promotions, conferences attended by engineering staff, bonds, fees, and so on.

External (environmental damage) costs are rarely mentioned or considered.  Making biofuels mines topsoil, depletes aquifers, creates immense eutrophication in the Gulf of Mexico and other waterways from fertilizer runoff, energy crops result in rainforests being cut down, and so on.

A report that chased down the energy in the infinite regressions of thousands of parts would take a lifetime and over a hundred thousand pages long. Therefore boundaries have to be set, which leads to never-ending fights between scientists. Just as tobacco industry funded scientific studies tended to find cigarettes did not cause cancer, energy industry-sponsored scientists tend to use very narrow boundaries and cherry-pick LCA data to come up with positive EROEI results, usually published in non-peer reviewed journals, which means the data and methods are often unavailable, making the results as trustworthy as science-fiction.  Systems ecologists, the experts and inventors of EROEI methodology, use wider boundaries, include more steps and components, energy rather than financial data whenever possible, and publish in peer-reviewed journals. Peer-reviewed journals require a review by scientists in the same field, and the data and methods are available to everyone so that the results can be verified and reproduced.

On average, the EROEI results of university systems ecologists in peer-reviewed, high quality, respected journals are much lower than the energy industry sponsored scientists in non-peer-reviewed industry publications.

Alternative energy resources must be sustainable and renewable

What’s the point of making biofuels if unsustainable amounts of fresh water, topsoil, and phosphorous are used, or windmills and solar PV if they depend on scarce, energy-intensive, and extremely damaging mining to get the rare earth metals required, leading to even more wars than we have now over oil to get the rare minerals that exist only in foreign countries?

Nevertheless, these studies are valuable no matter what the results, because you can see some of the oiliness. The more studies you read, the more you can decide whether the boundaries were too narrow and which scientists wrote the most complete and fair study.

Civilization needs energy resources with an EROEI of at least 12

Charles A. S. Hall, who founded EROEI methodology, initially thought an EROEI of at least 3 was needed to keep civilization as we know it operating. After three decades of research, he recently co-authored a paper that makes the case an EROEI of at least 12-14 is needed (Lambert).


AWEA. American Wind Energy Association. 2012. Anatomy of a Wind Turbine. There are over 8,000 components in each turbine assembly.

Farrell, et. al. Jan 27, 2006. Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals. Science Vol 311 506-508.

Lambert, Jessica G., Hall Charles A. S. et al. 2014. Energy, EROI and quality of life. Energy Policy 64:153–167

Lambert, J. Hall, Charles, et al. Nov 2012.  EROI of Global Energy Resources Preliminary Status and Trends.  State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry.

Pimentel, D and Patzek, T. March 2005. Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower. Natural Resources Research, Vol. 14 #1.



Posted in Alternative Energy, An Overview, Antecedents, EROEI Energy Returned on Energy Invested | 5 Comments

Revolutionary understanding of phsics needed to improve batteries – don’t hold your breath

What this Department of Energy document shows is that we can’t make the necessary REVOLUTIONARY breakthroughs to electrify cars until we understand the physics of batteries, and points out that “battery technology has not changed substantially in nearly 200 years.” page 3.

It’s how scientists like to say “don’t hold your breath” in as understated a way as possible.  Laws of physics?  That should have exclamation points.  And it sounds very expensive…

These are just a few of the challenges batteries and other kinds of electrical energy storage (EES) face.  I ran out of steam extracting them by page 35.

“Basic Research Needs for Electrical Energy Storage”. Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Workshop on Electrical Energy Storage April 2-4, 2007. Office of Science, U.S. Department Of Energy.

What Is a Battery?

A battery contains one or more electrochemical cells; these may be connected in series or parallel to provide the desired voltage and power. The anode is the electro-positive electrode from which electrons are generated to do external work. In a lithium cell, the anode contains lithium, commonly held within graphite in the well-known lithium-ion batteries. The cathode is the electronegative electrode to which positive ions migrate inside the cell and electrons migrate through the external electrical circuit. The electrolyte allows the flow of positive ions, for example lithium ions, from one electrode to another. It allows the flow only of ions and not of electrons. The electrolyte is commonly a liquid solution containing a salt dissolved in a solvent. The electrolyte must be stable in the presence of both electrodes. The current collectors allow the transport of electrons to and from the electrodes. They are typically metals and must not react with the electrode materials. Typically, copper is used for the anode and aluminum for the cathode (the lighterweight aluminum reacts with lithium and therefore cannot be used for lithium-based anodes). The cell voltage is determined by the energy of the chemical reaction occurring in the cell. The anode and cathode are, in practice, complex composites. They contain, besides the active material, polymeric binders to hold the powder structure together and conductive diluents such as carbon black to give the whole structure electronic conductivity so that electrons can be transported to the active material. In addition these components are combined so as to leave sufficient porosity to allow the liquid electrolyte to penetrate the powder structure and the ions to reach the reacting sites.

Fundamental Challenges

Batteries are inherently complex and virtually living systems—their electrochemistry, phase transformations, and transport processes vary not only during cycling but often also throughout their lifetime. Although they are often viewed as simple for consumers to use, their successful operation relies on a series of complex, interrelated mechanisms involving thermodynamic instability in many parts of the charge-discharge cycle and the formation of metastable phases. The requirements for long-term stability are extremely stringent and necessitate control of the chemical and physical processes over a wide variety of temporal and structural length scales.

A battery system involves interactions among various states of matter—crystalline and amorphous solids, polymers, and organic liquids, among others (see sidebar “What Is a Battery?”). Some components, such as the electrodes and electrolytes, are considered electrochemically active; others, such as the conductive additives, binders, current collectors and separators, are used mainly to maintain the electrode’s electronic and mechanical integrity. Yet all of these components contribute to battery function and interact with one another, contributing to a convoluted system of interrelated reactions and physico-chemical processes that can manifest themselves indirectly via a large variety of symptoms and phenomena.

To provide the major breakthroughs needed to address future technology requirements, a fundamental understanding of the chemical and physical processes that occur in these complex systems must be obtained. New analytical and computational methods and experimental strategies are required to study the properties of the individual components and their interfaces. An interdisciplinary effort is required that brings together chemists, materials scientists, and physicists. This is particularly important for a fundamental understanding of processes at the electrode-electrolyte interface.

The largest and most critical knowledge gaps exist in the basic understanding of the mechanisms and kinetics of the elementary steps that occur during battery operation. These processes—which include charge transfer phenomena, charge carrier and mass transport in the bulk of the materials and across interfaces, and structural changes and phase transitions— determine the main parameters of the entire EES system: energy density, charge-discharge rate, lifetime, and safety. For example, understanding structure and reactivity at hidden or buried interfaces is particularly important for understanding battery performance and failure modes. These interfaces may include a reaction front moving through a particle in a twophase reaction; an interface between the conducting matrix (e.g., carbon), the binder, or the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) (see PRD “Rational Design of Interfaces and Interphases”) and the electrode material; or a dislocation originally present in the material or caused by electrochemical cycling (Figure 2). New analytical tools are needed to allow monitoring of a reaction front moving through a particle in a two-phase reaction (Figure 1, ii) in real time, and to image concentration gradients and heterogeneity in these complex systems. A detailed, molecular-level understanding is needed of the mechanism by which an ion intercalates or reacts at the liquid-solid interface or at the gas-solid interface, depending on the type of battery being studied.

Further, an understanding is needed of how these mechanisms vary with surface and bulk structure, particle morphology, and electronic properties of the solid for both intercalation and conversion reactions. Also important is the ability to correlate the structure of the interface with its reactivity, to bridge the gap between localized ultrafast phenomena that occur at the Å–micron length scale and the macroscopic long-term behavior of the battery system. Gaining insight into the nature of these processes is key to designing novel materials and chemistries for the next generation of chemical EES devices. Recent advances in nanoscience, analytical techniques, and computational modeling present unprecedented opportunities to solve technical bottlenecks. New synthetic approaches can allow the design of materials with exquisite control of chemical and physical processes at the atomic and molecular levels. Development of in situ methods and even multi-technique probes that push the limits of both spatial and temporal resolution can provide detailed insight into these processes and relate them to electrode structure. New computational tools, which can be employed to model complex battery systems and can couple with experimental techniques both to feed data into modeling and to use modeling/theory to help interpret experimental data, are critically important.

The Potential of nano-science

The lack of a fundamental understanding of how thermodynamic properties, such as phase co-existence, change at the nanoscale is in stark contrast to the wealth of information available on the novel electronic, optical, and magnetic properties of nanomaterials. While the latter properties typically arise from the interaction of the electronic structure with the boundary conditions (e.g., electron confinement and/or localization), purely energetic properties and thermodynamic behavior change in a less transparent way at the nanoscale.

Many fundamental questions remain to be answered. For example, are the differences in the electrochemical properties of bulk and nanosize electrode materials simply due to the higher concentrations of different surfaces available for intercalation, or are the electronic properties of the nanomaterials significantly different? Are surface structures at the nanoscale significantly different from those in the bulk or are the improved properties simply a transport effect? At the nanoscale, can we conceptually separate pseudocapacitive from storage reactions? Can we develop general rules and, if so, how widely do we expect them to apply? How are ionic and electronic transport processes coupled in complex heterogeneous nanostructured materials? The ability to modify the properties of materials by treating size and shape as new variables presents great opportunities for designing new classes of materials for EES.

It is imperative to explore how the different properties of nanoparticles and their composites can be used to increase the power and energy efficiency of battery systems. A tremendous opportunity exists to exploit nanoscale phenomena to design new chemistries and even whole new electrode and electrolyte architectures—from nanoporous mesoscopic structures to three-dimensional electrodes with active and passive multifunctional components interconnected within architectures that offer superior energy storage capacity, fast kinetics and enhanced mass transport, and mechanical integrity. To do so, we need to be able to control chemistries and assembly processes. Furthermore, low-cost, high-volume synthesis and fabrication techniques and nanocomposites with improved safety characteristics must be designed, to satisfy requirements for large-scale manufacturing of nanostructure materials and for their use in practical battery systems.

New Capabilities in Computation and Analysis

Although clever engineering can address some inherent problems with a particular battery chemistry, dramatic improvements in performance will ultimately come from the development of different electrode and electrolyte materials. New computational and analysis tools are needed to realize significant breakthroughs in these areas. For example, new analytical tools will provide an understanding of how the phase behavior and electrochemical properties of materials are modified at the atomic level. With this information, computational tools will expedite the design of materials with structures and architectures tailored for specific performance characteristics. It is now possible to predict many properties of materials before attempting to synthesize and test them (see Appendix B, “Probing Electrical Energy Storage Chemistry And Physics Over Broad Time And Length Scales,” for further details), and expanded computational capabilities specific to chemical energy storage are a critical need. New capabilities in modeling and simulation could help unravel the complex processes involved in charge transport across the electrode-electrolyte interface and identify underlying reactions that cause capacity degradation.

Tremendous opportunities exist to develop and apply novel experimental methodologies with increased spatial, energy, and temporal resolution. These could answer a wide range of fundamental questions in chemical electrical storage, identifying and providing ways to overcome some of the barriers in this field. In particular, techniques that combine higher resolution imaging, fast spectroscopic tools, and improved electrochemical probes will enable researchers to unravel the complex processes that occur at electrodes, electrolytes, and interfaces.



To realize the full potential of electrochemical capacitors (ECs) as electrical energy storage (EES) devices, new materials and chemical processes are needed to improve their charge storage capabilities by increasing both their energy and their power densities. Incremental changes in existing technologies will not produce the breakthroughs needed to realize these improvements. Rather, a fundamental understanding of the physical and chemical processes that take place in the EC—including the electrodes, the electrolytes, and especially their interfaces—is needed to design revolutionary concepts. For example, new strategies in which EC materials simultaneously exploit multiple charge storage mechanisms need to be identified. Charge storage mechanisms need to be understood to enable the design of new materials for pseudocapacitors and hybrid devices. There is a need for new electrolytes that have high ionic conductivity in combination with wide electrochemical, chemical, and thermal stability; are non-toxic, biodegradable, and/or renewable; can be immobilized; and can be produced from sustainable sources. New continuum, atomistic, and quantum mechanical models are needed to understand solvents and ions in pores, predict new material chemistries and architectures, and discover new physical phenomena at the electrochemical interfaces. From fundamental science, novel energy storage mechanisms can be designed into new materials. With these breakthroughs, ECs have the potential to emerge as an important energy storage technology in the future.


Little is known about the physico-chemical consequences of nanoscale dimensions (see sidebar “Correlation Between Pore Size, Ion Size, and Specific Capacitance”). Further, it is necessary to understand how various factors—such as pore size, surface area, and surface chemistry— affect the performance of ECs. This knowledge can be used to design nanostructured materials with optimized architectures that could yield dramatic improvements in current capabilities in energy and power. Novel electrolyte systems that operate at higher voltages and have higher room-temperature conductivity are critically needed for the next generation of ECs. Fundamentals of solvation dynamics, molecular interactions at interfaces, and ion transport must be better understood to tailor electrolytes for optimal performance. Exciting opportunities exist for creating multifunctional electrolytes that scavenge impurities and exhibit self-healing. A potential bridge between ECs and batteries is combining a batterytype electrode with a capacitor-type electrode in so-called hybrid or asymmetric ECs.6 This approach needs to be better understood at the fundamental level so that it enables the tailoring of energy density without compromising power density. In situ characterization of the electrolyte/electrode interface during charging/discharging at molecular and atomic levels is critical to understanding the fundamental processes in capacitive energy storage. This will require the development of new experimental techniques that combine measurement and imaging, including so-called chemical imaging, where chemical information can be obtained at high spatial resolution. In addition, new computational capabilities can allow modeling of active materials, electrolytes, and electrochemical processes at the nanoscale and across broad length and time scales. These models will assist in the discovery of new materials and the performance evaluation of new system designs.

Background and Motivation
A chemical energy storage system (battery) is inherently complex, consisting of a cathode, an
electrolyte, and an anode (see sidebar “What is a Battery?” on page 11). Any future system
must be designed to include a number of essential characteristics, including
• high energy density;
• sufficient power achieved through holistic design of the storage materials, supporting
components, and device construction;
• electrochemical and materials stability to ensure long lifetimes;
• practical materials synthesis and device fabrication approaches;
• reasonable cost; and
• optimized safe operation and manageable toxicity and environmental effects.
Future chemical energy storage applications, ranging from portable consumer products to
hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles to electrical distribution load-leveling, require years to
decades of deep discharge with subsequent recharging (charge-discharge cycles). This level
of use must occur with minimal loss of performance so that the same capacity is available on
every discharge (i.e., with minimal capacity fade). The necessity of ensuring stable cycle-life
response has restricted the number of electrons that can be transferred in any given discharge
or charge reaction, thereby limiting the utilization of the electrodes and the amount of energy
that could be available from the batteries.
This restriction in battery operation is driven by the fact that deep, but thermodynamically
allowable, discharge reactions usually drive the electrodes toward physical and chemical
conditions that cannot be fully reversed upon charging. The extent to which the physical and
chemical properties of electrode materials change during electrochemical cycling is
dependent on the battery’s chemistry. For example, during charge-discharge, the electrode
materials can undergo damaging structural changes. They can fracture, resulting in the loss of
electronic contact, and they can dissolve in the electrolyte, thereby lowering the cycling
efficiency and delivered energy of the batteries.

I’m amazed you got this far.  This is just page 35 of 186 pages, go read the rest online if your eyes haven’t glazed over yet!

Posted in Batteries | Leave a comment

United States Energy: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

United States Energy Information Administration FAQ


Conversion & Equivalents

Crude Oil





General Energy

Natural Gas




Posted in An Overview | Comments Off

Electricity Energy Information Administration (EIA) Frequently Asked Questions

Energy Information Administration (EIA) Frequently Asked Questions about Electricity

n 2013, the United States generated about 4,058 billion kilowatthours of electricity.  About 67% of the electricity generated was from fossil fuel (coal, natural gas, and petroleum), with 39% attributed from coal.

In 2013, energy sources and percent share of total electricity generation were

  • Coal 39%
  • Natural Gas 27%
  • Nuclear 19%
  • Hydropower 7%
  • Other Renewable 6%
    • Biomass 1.48%
    • Geothermal 0.41%
    • Solar 0.23%
    • Wind 4.13%
  • Petroleum 1%
  • Other Gases < 1%

Does EIA have data on each power plant in the United States?

Other FAQs about Electricity

Data on existing individual electric generators at U.S. power plants, including the operational status, generating capacity, primary fuel/energy sources used, type of prime mover, location, the month and year of initial operation, and other information are collected with the EIA-860 survey.   Summary data on all generators are available in worksheets by the primary fuel/energy source used by the generators. Monthly and total annual fuel consumption, power generation, and various environmental data for power plants are collected with the EIA-923 survey.



EIA has an interactive map that includes the location of power plants and major electric power transmission lines in the United States.  To learn more about this map, play a short instructional video on how to use the EIA State Energy Portal tool. EIA currently does not  publish any other information on the location of power lines. The address of power plants with 1 MW or greater in generation capacity are in the “PlantYyy” file of the EIA-860 database



EIA estimates that the U.S. residential sector consumed about 1,375 billion kilowatthours of electricity in 2012. Estimated U.S. Residential Electricity Consumption by End Use, 2012

End Use Quadrillion
Share of
Space cooling 0.85 250 18%
Lighting 0.64 186 14%
Water heating 0.45 130 9%
Refrigeration 0.38 111 8%
Televisions and related equipment 1 0.33 98 7%
Space heating 0.29 84 6%
Clothes dryers 0.20 59 4%
Computers and related equipment2 0.12 37 3%
Cooking 0.11 31 2%
Dishwashers3 0.10 29 2%
Furnace fans and boiler circulation pumps 0.09 28 2%
Freezers 0.08 24 2%
Clothes washers3 0.03 9 1%
Other uses4 1.02 299 22%
Total consumption 4.69 1,375  

1 Includes televisions, set-top boxes, home theater systems, DVD players, and video game consoles. 2 Includes desktop and laptop computers, monitors, and networking equipment. 3 Does not include water heating portion of load. 4 Includes small electric devices, heating elements, and motors not listed above. Electric vehicles are included in the transportation sector.

There are about 19,023 individual generators at about 6,997 operational power plants in the United States with a nameplate generation capacity of at least one megawatt. A power plant can have one or more generators, and some generators may use more than one type of fuel. Learn more: Electric Power Annual 2012, Table 4.1: Count of Electric Power Industry Power Plants, by Sector, by Predominant Energy Sources within Plant (some plants are double-counted by fuel type in Table 4.1), and Table 4.3: Existing Capacity by Energy Source. Downloadable databases with detailed data on individual generators and power plants.

The amount of fuel used to generate electricity depends on the efficiency or heat rate of the generator (or power plant) and the heat content of the fuel. Power plant efficiencies (heat rates) vary by types of generators, power plant emission controls, and other factors. Fuel heat contents also vary.

Two formulas for calculating the amount of fuel used to generate a kilowatthour (kWh) of electricity:

  • Amount of fuel used per kWh = Heat rate (in Btu per kWh) / Fuel heat content (in Btu per physical unit)
  • Kilowatthour generated per unit of fuel used = Fuel heat content (in Btu per physical unit) / Heat rate (in Btu per kWh)

Calculation examples using these two formulas and the assumptions below:

  • Amount of fuel used to generate one kilowatthour (kWh):
    • Coal = 0.00054 short tons or 1.09 pounds
    • Natural gas = 0.00786 Mcf (1,000 cubic feet)
    • Petroleum = 0.00188 barrels (or 0.08 gallons)
  • Kilowatthour generated per unit of fuel used:
    • 1,842 kWh per ton of Coal or 0.9 kWh per pound of Coal
    • 127 kWh per Mcf (1,000 cubic feet) of Natural gas
    • 533 kWh per barrel of Petroleum, or 12.7 kWh per gallon

Assumptions: Power plant heat rate

  • Coal = 10,498 Btu/kWh
  • Natural gas = 8,039 Btu/kWh
  • Petroleum = 10,991 Btu/kWh

Fuel heat contents

  • Coal = 19,336,000 Btu per short ton (2,000 lbs) Note: heat contents of coal vary widely by types of coal.
  • Natural gas  = 1,023,000 Btu per 1,000 Cubic Feet (Mcf)
  • Petroleum = 5,861,814 Btu per Barrel (42 gallons) Note: Heat contents vary by type of petroleum product.

EIA publishes estimates for the capital costs for different types of electricity generators in the Updated Capital Cost Estimates for Electricity Generation Plants report.

EIA estimates that national electricity transmission and distribution losses average about 6% of the electricity that is transmitted and distributed in the United States each year

Capacity factor is a measure of how often an electric generator runs for a specific period of time. It indicates how much electricity a generator actually produces relative to the maximum it could produce at continuous full power operation during the same period.

Over the past 6 years, the average capacity factors were: Coal 64%, Natural Gas combined cycle 44%, Nuclear 90%, Hydropower 40%, Wind 31%, Solar PV 20%, Solar Thermal 22%, Geothermal 71%

Capacity is the maximum electric output a generator can produce under specific conditions. Nameplate capacity is determined by the generator’s manufacturer and indicates the maximum output a generator can produce without exceeding design thermal limits.

Net summer capacity and net winter capacity are typically determined by a performance test and indicate the maximum load a generator can support at the point of interconnection during the respective season. The primary factors that affect or determine the difference in capacity between summer and winter months are:

  • the temperature of cooling water for thermal power plants or of the ambient air for combustion turbines
  • the water flow and reservoir storage characteristics for hydropower plants

Generation is the amount of electricity a generator produces over a specific period of time. For example, a generator with 1 megawatt (mW) capacity that operates at that capacity consistently for one hour will produce 1 megawatthour (mWh) of electricity. If it operates at only half that capacity for one hour, it will produce 0.5 mWh of electricity. Many generators do not operate at their full capacity all the time; they may vary their output according to conditions at the power plant, fuel costs, and/or as instructed from the electric power grid operator.

Net generation is the amount of gross generation a generator produces less the electricity used to operate the power plant.  These uses include fuel handling, feedwater pumps, combustion air fans, cooling water pumps, pollution control equipment, and other electricity needs.

One measure of the efficiency of a power plant that converts a fuel into heat and into electricity is the heat rate. The heat rate is the amount of energy used by an electrical generator or power plant to generate one kilowatthour (kWh) of electricity. EIA expresses heat rates in British thermal units (Btu) per net kWh generated. Net generation is the amount of electricity a power plant (or generator) supplies to the power transmission line connected to the power plant. It accounts for all the electricity that the plant itself consumes to operate the generator(s) and other equipment, such as fuel feeding systems, boiler water pumps, cooling equipment, and pollution control devices.

To express the efficiency of a generator or power plant as a percentage, divide the equivalent Btu content of a kWh of electricity (which is 3,412 Btu) by the heat rate. For example, if the heat rate is 10,140 Btu, the efficiency is 34%. If the heat rate is 7,500 Btu, the efficiency is 45%.

EIA only publishes heat rates for fossil fuel-fired generators and nuclear power plants. EIA does not publish estimates for the efficiency of generators using biomass, geothermal, hydro, solar, and wind energy.

Learn more:

Historical average annual heat rates for fossil fuel and nuclear power plants.

Average annual heat rates for specific types of fossil-fuel generators and nuclear power plants for most recent year available.

EIA has data on the types and amounts of energy produced in each state:

EIA also has  the location of coal mines, electric power plants, and oil and natural gas fields in our interactive map. A short instructional video is available to learn how to use this tool.

Posted in Electric Grid | Comments Off

Antibiotic Resistance

Jones, Tamera. 21 July 2014. Sewage treatment contributes to antibiotic resistance

G. C. A. Amos, P. M. Hawkey, W. H. Gaze and E. M. Wellington, Waste water effluent contributes to the dissemination of CTX-M-15 in the natural environment, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy2014; 69: 1785 – 1791, published online 5th May 2014, doi:10.1093/jac/dku079

Wastewater treatment plants could be unwittingly helping to spread antibiotic resistance, say scientists.  Their research suggests that processing human, farm and industrial waste all together in one place might be making it easier for bacteria to become resistant to a wide range of even the most clinically-effective antibiotics. With so many different types of bacteria coming together in sewage plants we could be giving them a perfect opportunity to swap genes that confer resistance, helping them live. This means antibiotic-resistant bacteria may be evolving much faster than they would in isolation.

The research, published in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, shows that there are now reservoirs of highly resistant gut bacteria in the environment, threatening human and animal health.

We urgently need to find new ways to process waste more effectively so we don’t inadvertently contribute to the problem of drug-resistant bacteria.

Earlier studies have suggested that farming and waste processing methods contribute to reservoirs of resistant bacteria in the environment. But, until now, very few studies had looked at whether or not wastewater effluent contributes to the problem.

We’re on the brink of Armageddon and this is just contributing to it. Antibiotics could just stop working and we could all be colonized by antibiotic-resistant bacteria.’ Professor Elizabeth Wellington of the University of Warwick.

Posted in Antibiotics | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Global Nausea

Global Nausea by James Howard Kunstler

Any American influence left in Iraq should focus on rebuilding the credibility of national institutions.  – Editorial, The New York Times

Gosh, isn’t that what we spent eight years, 4,500 lives, and $1.7 trillion doing? And how did that work out? The Iraq war is just like the US financial system. The people in charge can’t imagine writing off their losses. Which, from the policy standpoint, leaves the USA pounding sand down so many rat holes that there may be no ground left to stand on anywhere. We’ll be lucky if our national life doesn’t soon resemble The Revenge of the Mole People.

The arc of this story points to at least one likely conclusion: the dreadful day that ISIS (shorthand for whatever they call themselves) overruns the US Green Zone in Baghdad. Won’t that be a nauseating spectacle? Perhaps just in time for the 2014 US elections. And what do you suppose the policy meeting will be like in the White House war room the day after?

Will anyone argue that the USA just take a break from further operations in the entire Middle East / North Africa region? My recommendation would be to stand back, do nothing, and see what happens — since everything we’ve done so far just leaves things and lives shattered. Let’s even say that ISIS ends up consolidating power in Iraq, Syria, and some other places. The whole region will get a very colorful demonstration of what it is like to live under an 11th century style psychopathic despotism, and then the people left after the orgy of beheading and crucifixion can decide if they like it. The experience might be clarifying.

In any case, what we’re witnessing in the Middle East — apparently unbeknownst to the newspapers and the cable news orgs — is what happens in extreme population overshoot: chaos, murder, economic collapse. The human population in this desolate corner of the world has expanded on the artificial nutriment of oil profits, which have allowed governments to keep feeding their people, and maintaining an artificial middle class to work in meaningless bureaucratic offices where, at best, they do nothing and, at worst, hassle their fellow citizens for bribes and payoffs.

There is not a nation on earth that is preparing intelligently for the end of oil — and by that I mean 1) the end of cheap, affordable oil, and 2) the permanent destabilization of existing oil supply lines. Both of these conditions should be visible now in the evolving geopolitical dynamic, but nobody is paying attention, for instance, in the hubbub over Ukraine. That feckless, unfortunate, and tragic would-be nation, prompted by EU and US puppeteers, just replied to the latest trade sanction salvo from Russia by declaring it would block the delivery of Russian gas to Europe through pipelines on its territory. I hope everybody west of Dnepropetrovsk is getting ready to burn the furniture come November. But that just shows how completely irrational the situation has become… and I stray from my point.

Which is that in the worst case that ISIS succeeds in establishing a sprawling caliphate, they will never be able to govern it successfully, only preside over an awesome episode of bloodletting and social collapse. This is especially true in what is now called Saudi Arabia, with its sclerotic ruling elite clinging to power. If and when the ISIS maniacs come rolling in on a cavalcade of You-Tube beheading videos, what are the chances that the technicians running the oil infrastructure there will stick around on the job? And could ISIS run all that machinery themselves? I wouldn’t count on it. And I wouldn’t count on global oil supply lines continuing to function in the way the world requires them to. If you’re looking for the near-future spark of World War Three, start there.

By the way, the US is no less idiotic than Ukraine. We’ve sold ourselves the story that shale oil will insulate us from all the woes and conflicts breaking out elsewhere in the world over the dissolving oil economy paradigm. The shale oil story is false. By my reckoning we have about a year left of the drive-to-Walmart-economy before the public broadly gets what trouble we’re in. The amazing thing is that the public might get to that realization even before its political leadership does. That dynamic leads straight to the previously unthinkable (not for 150 years, anyway) breakup of the United States.

Posted in James Howard Kunstler | Comments Off

Patzek: CTL coal-to-liquids from FT Synthesis is NOT likely to happen

CTL Mordor

This is a liquid fuel crisis – diesel to be exact – to keep tractors, trucks, trains, and ships moving. There’s not enough coal or water to make even a small percent of the FT-CTL diesel fuel we need from coal in Montana or Wyoming, and would turn these beautiful states into Mordor (in Tolkien’s trilogy “Lord of the Rings”).   Alice Friedemann at

Patzek, T. W. et al. Sep 2009. Potential for Coal-to-Liquids Conversion in the United States—Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis. Natural Resources Research, Vol. 18, No. 3

America has the world’s largest coal reserves, and the best spot to locate a coal-to-liquids (CTL) plant would be in Montana near one of the largest coal deposits. CTL is seen as a way to replace depleting petroleum reserves, but there are several major drawbacks:

  1. The Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process is only half as efficient as refining crude oil
  2. The resulting CO2 emissions are 20 times (2000%) higher
  3. An enormous amount of water is needed: 1000 kg of coal needs 1000 kg of water
  4. You’d need to use over 40% of the FT fuel energy to sequester the CO2
  5. CTL is a poor use for coal as long as natural gas is cheaper for generating electricity
  6. FT plants and the surrounding mine are very expensive to build
  7. converting petroleum to diesel fuel is 88% energy-efficient, but less than 50% efficient in the FT process (which produces a high-wax crude oil, not diesel fuel)

Only South Africa uses the FT process to make diesel and gasoline from 45 million tons of coal every year. This led to serious environmental problems:

  1. Enormous amounts of land are strip mined and covered with up to 50 million tons of mining waste per year, waste that’s high in sulfur (1-7.8%) and ash (24-63%).
  2. When the waste is burned, the Eastern Transvaal Highveld is doused in acid rain
  3. These plants need 5 barrels of water per barrel of FT oil produced

A small plant making 22,000 BPD of FT fuel would use 20% of the current coal production in Montana. A 300,000 plant large enough to supply the military would need twice as much Montana coal as is being mined now, three times as much Montana water as mines are now using,

The three larger plant designs extend into the realm of surrealism. For example, the 300,000 BPD plant, sufficient to supply most of the U.S. military needs, would consume twice the current coal production in Montana, thrice the current water use by Montana mines, and each year would produce 11 million toxic tons of ash with arsenic, mercury, sulfur, uranium thorium, among other things. Or as Tad Patzek puts it “If Montanans wish to destroy their beautiful state, then large FT plants offer an almost certain fulfilment of this wish….Stored coal ash slurries eventually threaten water supplies, human health, and local ecosystems.”

Electric power generation is the dominant use of coal in the United States, accounting for 92.3% of U.S. coal usage in 2006. Other industrial use accounted for 5.3% and coke accounted for only 2.1% of U.S. coal consumption in 2006.

It’s not clear that we can find enough coal for both CTL and coal generated electricity. Although natural gas plants have been increasing in number because of the temporary fracking boom, and the need to balance the wind load of intermittent power to keep the grid stable, there’s not enough natural gas to replace all coal plants.  Other load-balancing energy resources can’t step in for coal electric generation to free it up for CTL either: most geothermal is in non-coal-burning states with a max of 9,000 MW from known resources and perhaps another 33,000 MW left to be founde.  Nuclear power isn’t going to ramp up quickly for many reasons.


1. The large volumes of coal required for CTL suggest that the Powder River Basin of Wyoming and Montana is likely to be the coal source.

2. Although U.S. coal reserves are large, recent coal price increases suggest that there is no global coal surplus in the short term.

3. The Powder River coal, cheapest in the United States, would inevitably double or triple in price if there were a high-throughput railroad connection to the Pacific or Atlantic coast.

4. The energy efficiency of an optimal coal-based FT process that produces liquid fuels is 41%. This means that for every 1 unit of fuel energy out, one needs to put 2.4 units of coal energy in.

5. Because of the different energy contents of subbituminous coal and FT fuel, and a low energy efficiency of CTL conversion, roughly 800 kg of the average Powder River Basin coal will be needed to produce 1 barrel of the FT fuel.

6. Per unit energy in a liquid transportation fuel, carbon dioxide emissions from a CT plant are about 20 times higher than those from a petroleum refinery.

7. Subsurface disposal of carbon dioxide produced by the FT plants costs at least 40% of the thermal energy in FT fuel. If this disposal were deeper than assumed here, the current estimate might increase by a factor of up to 4.

8. Montana does not have the approximately 800 kg of clean water necessary to produce each barrel of FT fuel.

9. Natural gas can be compressed and used for transportation fuel with an efficiency of 98%. Therefore, the FT transportation fuel from coal is always uneconomic as long as natural gas competes with coal for power generation. This is true even if the gas-fired plants are more efficient combined cycle designs and the coal plants are conventional.

10. Judging by the recent financing of corn ethanol refineries, the astronomical construction costs of coal-based FT plants might be borne by the U. S. taxpayers through a new subsidy program.

11. The massive societal costs of the subsidies required to render CTL ‘‘economical,’’ and the environmental costs of fuel production would be borne by all Americans and the planet at large, but especially by the people of Montana and the surrounding states, including Canada


Posted in Coal, Tad Patzek | 2 Comments